No one has been more critical of EO than I have, but the above isn't entirely accurate. They might interpret aspects differently, but that is not the same as "not entailing..."
Creation: EO usually gets accused of being too creational.
Fall: They reject what they understand original sin to be (and I think they are wrong there), but they hold to a fall.
Redemption: They are wrong to limit most models of redemption to 2 Peter 1:4, but surely the believe in redemption. Granted, we have issues with their synergism. Irenaeus on recapitulation is a good start.
Restoration: Are we implying that they don't believe the cosmos will be restored? Surely not. Merely a perusal of Ephraim the Syrian or John Meyendorff will convince otherwise.