RamistThomist
Puritanboard Assessor
if anyone can find the pdfs of these articles, I would appreciate it.
"Article Review: Graham Ward's Barth, Derrida and the Language of Theology" Scottish Journal of Theology 49 (1996): 97-109.
"Barth in Context: A Response to Professor Gunton" Scottish Journal of Theology 49 (1996): 491-8
"Revelation and History in Transfoundationalist Perspective: Karl Barth's Theological Epistemology in Conversation with a Schleiermacherian Tradition", Journal of Religion 78 (January 1998): 18-37.
"The Sum of the Gospel: The Doctrine of Election in the Theologies of Alexander Schweizer and Karl Barth" in David Willis and Michael Welker, eds., Toward the Future of Reformed Theology: Tasks, Topics, Traditions(Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1999), pp.470-93.
“What Has Basel to Do with Berlin? Continuities in the Theologies of Barth and Schleiermacher,” The Princeton Seminary Bulletin 23 (2002): 146-73.
“The End of Reformed Theology? The Voice of Karl Barth in the Doctrinal Chaos of the Present”, Wallace Alston, Jr. and Michael Welker, eds., Reformed Theology: Identity and Ecumenicity (Grand Rapids and Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2003): 46-64
“The Being of Holy Scripture is in Becoming: Karl Barth in Conversation with American Evangelical Criticism” in Evangelicals and Scripture: Tradition, Authority and Hermeneutics, ed. by Vincent E. Bacote, Laura C. Miguélez and Dennis L. Okholm (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2004), pp.55-75
“The Ontological Presuppositions of Barth’s Doctrine of the Atonement” in The Glory of the Atonement: Biblical, Historical and Practical Perspectives, ed. by Charles E. Hill and Frank A. James III (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2004), pp. 346-66
“Christ and the Decree: An Unsettled Question for the Reformed Churches Today” in Reformed Theology in Contemporary Perspective: Westminster: Yesterday, Today - and Tomorrow? ed. by Lynn Quigley (Edinburgh: Rutherford House, 2006), pp.124-42.
“Justitia Aliena: Karl Barth in Conversation with the Evangelical Doctrine of Imputed Righteousness” in Bruce L. McCormack, ed., Justification in Perspective: Historical Developments and Contemporary Challenges (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006), 167-96.
“Seek God Where He May Be Found: A Response to Edwin Chr. van Driel”, Scottish Journal of Theology 60 (2007): 62-79
“God’s Being is His Decision: The Jüngel- Gollwitzer ‘Debate’Revisited” in Kimlyn J. Bender and Bruce L. McCormack, eds., Theology as Conversation: The Significance of Dialogue in Historical and Contemporary Theology (A Festschrift for Daniel L. Migliore (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2009)
“‘With Loud Cries and Tears’: The Humanity of the Son in the Epistle to the Hebrews” in Richard Bauckham, Daniel R. Driver, Trevor A. Hart and Nathan McDonald, eds., The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2009), pp.37-68.
“Divine Impassibility or Simply Divine Constancy? Implications of Karl Barth’s Later Christology for Debates over Impassibility” in James F. Keating and Thomas Joseph White, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2009), p.150-86
“Let’s Speak Plainly: A Response to Paul Molnar,” Theology Today 67 (2010): 57-65.
“Karl Barth’s Version of an ‘Analogy of Being’: A Dialectical No and Yes to Roman Catholicism’ in Thomas Joseph White, ed., The Analogia Entis: Inventions of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God? (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2010).
“The Doctrine of the Trinity After Barth: An Attempt to Reconstruct Barth’s Doctrine in the Light of His Later Christology” in Myk Habets and Philip Tolliday, eds., Trinity After Barth (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2010).
“The Lord and Giver of Life: A ‘Barthian’ Defense of the Filioque” in Guilio Maspero and Robert Wozniak, eds., Rethinking Trinitarian Theology: Disputed Questions and Contemporary Issues in Trinitarian Theology (London/New York: Continuum, 2010).
"Article Review: Graham Ward's Barth, Derrida and the Language of Theology" Scottish Journal of Theology 49 (1996): 97-109.
"Barth in Context: A Response to Professor Gunton" Scottish Journal of Theology 49 (1996): 491-8
"Revelation and History in Transfoundationalist Perspective: Karl Barth's Theological Epistemology in Conversation with a Schleiermacherian Tradition", Journal of Religion 78 (January 1998): 18-37.
"The Sum of the Gospel: The Doctrine of Election in the Theologies of Alexander Schweizer and Karl Barth" in David Willis and Michael Welker, eds., Toward the Future of Reformed Theology: Tasks, Topics, Traditions(Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1999), pp.470-93.
“What Has Basel to Do with Berlin? Continuities in the Theologies of Barth and Schleiermacher,” The Princeton Seminary Bulletin 23 (2002): 146-73.
“The End of Reformed Theology? The Voice of Karl Barth in the Doctrinal Chaos of the Present”, Wallace Alston, Jr. and Michael Welker, eds., Reformed Theology: Identity and Ecumenicity (Grand Rapids and Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2003): 46-64
“The Being of Holy Scripture is in Becoming: Karl Barth in Conversation with American Evangelical Criticism” in Evangelicals and Scripture: Tradition, Authority and Hermeneutics, ed. by Vincent E. Bacote, Laura C. Miguélez and Dennis L. Okholm (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2004), pp.55-75
“The Ontological Presuppositions of Barth’s Doctrine of the Atonement” in The Glory of the Atonement: Biblical, Historical and Practical Perspectives, ed. by Charles E. Hill and Frank A. James III (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2004), pp. 346-66
“Christ and the Decree: An Unsettled Question for the Reformed Churches Today” in Reformed Theology in Contemporary Perspective: Westminster: Yesterday, Today - and Tomorrow? ed. by Lynn Quigley (Edinburgh: Rutherford House, 2006), pp.124-42.
“Justitia Aliena: Karl Barth in Conversation with the Evangelical Doctrine of Imputed Righteousness” in Bruce L. McCormack, ed., Justification in Perspective: Historical Developments and Contemporary Challenges (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006), 167-96.
“Seek God Where He May Be Found: A Response to Edwin Chr. van Driel”, Scottish Journal of Theology 60 (2007): 62-79
“God’s Being is His Decision: The Jüngel- Gollwitzer ‘Debate’Revisited” in Kimlyn J. Bender and Bruce L. McCormack, eds., Theology as Conversation: The Significance of Dialogue in Historical and Contemporary Theology (A Festschrift for Daniel L. Migliore (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2009)
“‘With Loud Cries and Tears’: The Humanity of the Son in the Epistle to the Hebrews” in Richard Bauckham, Daniel R. Driver, Trevor A. Hart and Nathan McDonald, eds., The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2009), pp.37-68.
“Divine Impassibility or Simply Divine Constancy? Implications of Karl Barth’s Later Christology for Debates over Impassibility” in James F. Keating and Thomas Joseph White, eds., Divine Impassibility and the Mystery of Human Suffering (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2009), p.150-86
“Let’s Speak Plainly: A Response to Paul Molnar,” Theology Today 67 (2010): 57-65.
“Karl Barth’s Version of an ‘Analogy of Being’: A Dialectical No and Yes to Roman Catholicism’ in Thomas Joseph White, ed., The Analogia Entis: Inventions of the Antichrist or the Wisdom of God? (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2010).
“The Doctrine of the Trinity After Barth: An Attempt to Reconstruct Barth’s Doctrine in the Light of His Later Christology” in Myk Habets and Philip Tolliday, eds., Trinity After Barth (Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2010).
“The Lord and Giver of Life: A ‘Barthian’ Defense of the Filioque” in Guilio Maspero and Robert Wozniak, eds., Rethinking Trinitarian Theology: Disputed Questions and Contemporary Issues in Trinitarian Theology (London/New York: Continuum, 2010).
