What does it Mean that God is Light?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sam Jer

Puritan Board Junior
In 1 John 1:5-7 KJV, Daniel 2:22 KJV, Psalm 112:4 KJV, and other passages, God is described as Light.
This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.

I am struggling to wrap my head around about what this actually means. Obviously it is metaphorical to some extent (after all God created light, but he is not created himself). But I am struggling with what exactly it means. Any helps?
Both your'e own thoughts and helpful quotes will be appreciated.
 
“if there is composition in God, then he is not the light in which there is no darkness, not pure deity; for parts, as they are doubtless diverse, could not constitute such pure deity” Van Mastricht (TPT, 2:144)

Gregory of Nazianzen:
For our part we have such confidence in the Godhead of the Spirit, that, rash though some may find it, we shall begin our theological exposition by applying identical expressions to the Three. “He was the true light that enlightens every man coming into the world”—yes, the Father. “He was the true light that enlightens every man coming into the world”—yes, the Son. “He was the true light that enlightens every man coming into the world—yes, the Comforter. These are three subjects and three verbs—he was and he was and he was. But a single reality was. There are three predicates—light and light and light. But the light is one, God is one. This is the meaning of David’s prophetic vision: “In your light we shall see light.” We receive the Son’s light from the Father’s light in the light of the Spirit: that is what we ourselves have seen and what we now proclaim. It is the plain and simple explanation of the Trinity. (31.4)
 
Matthew Poole on 1 John 1:5
God is light; in God all true perfections and excellencies must be understood eminently to concur; and of them more could not have been comprehended under one word, (especially that belong to him considered relatively to his creatures, of which perfections it concerns us to have more distinct, formed, positive conceptions in all our applications to him), than are here some way represented or resembled by light, viz. that he is a Being of most lively, penetrative vigour, absolute simplicity, immutability, knowledge, wisdom, sincerity, righteousness, serenity, benignity, joy, and felicity, and especially of most bright and glorious holiness and purity; and in whom is no darkness at all, nothing contrary or repugnant hereto.
 
Hugh Binning, Works, 795-796

“This then is the message, that God is light.” Because we cannot conceive in our poor narrow minds what God is in himself, therefore he expresseth to us often in similitudes to the creatures, and condescends to our capacity. As he stands in manifold relations to us, so he takes the most familiar names, that may hold out to our dull senses what we may expect of him. Therefore he calls himself a Father, a King, a Husband, a Rock, a Buckler, and Strong Tower, a Mountain, and whatsoever else they may represent to our hearts, that which may strengthen them in believing. But there is no creature so directly attributed to God, as light, none used to express his very nature and being, as abstracted from these relations, but this,—“God is light,” and Christ takes it to himself—“the light of the world, and the life of men.” The truth is, it hath some excellency in it above all other visible creatures, that it may fitly carry some resemblance to him. The scripture calls light his garment, Psal. civ. 2. And truly it is a more glorious robe of Majesty than all the royal and imperial robes and garments of state that either angels or men could contrive. The light is, as it were, a visible appearance of the invisible God. He hath covered his invisible nature with this glorious garment to make himself in a manner visible to man. It is true, that light is but, as it were, a shadow of that inaccessible light, umbra Dei. It is the dark shadow of God, who is himself infinitely more beautiful and glorious. But yet, as to us, it hath greater glory and majesty in it than any creature besides. It is the chief of the works of God, without which the world would be without form, and void. It is the very beauty of the creation, that which gives lustre and amiableness to all that is in it, without which the pleasantest paradise would become a wilderness, and this beautiful structure, and adorned palace of the world, a loathsome dungeon. Besides the admirable beauty of it, it hatha wonderful swift conveyance, throughout the whole world, the upper and lower, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye. It is carried from the one end of heaven to the other in a moment, and who can say by what way the light is parted? Job xxxviii. 24.Moreover it carries alongst with it a beautiful influence, and a refreshing heat and warmness, which is the very life and subsistence of all the creatures below. And so, as there is nothing so beautiful, so, nothing so universally and highly profitable. And to all this, add that singular property of it, that it is not capable of infection, it is of such absolute purity, that it can communicate itself to the dunghill, as well as to the garden, without receiving any mixture from it. In all the impurities it meets withal, it remains unmixed and untainted, and preserves its own nature entire. Now you may perceive, that there is nothing visible that is fitter to resemble the invisible God, than this glorious, beautiful, pure, and universally communicable creature, light.

From: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/24238/24238-pdf.pdf

He goes on to speak of light as conveying the ideas of knowledge, purity, benignity, infallibility and incomprehensibility.
 
Stephen Charnock, Existence & Attributes of God, Discourse VIII On God's Knowledge
Prop. IV. God knows all things distinctly. His understanding is infinite in regard of clearness; “God is light, and in him is no darknessat all” (John 1:5); he sees not through a mist or cloud; there is no blemish in his understanding, no mote or beam in his eye, to renderany thing obscure to him. Man discerns the surface and outside of things; little or nothing of the essence of things; we see the noblestthing but “as in a glass darkly” (1 Cor. 13:12); the too great nearness, as well as the too great distance of a thing, hinders our sight; thesmallness of a mote escapes our eye, and so our knowledge; also the weakness of our understanding is troubled with the multitude ofthings, and cannot know many things but confusedly: but God knows the forms and essence of things, every circumstance; nothing isso deep, but he sees to the bottom; he sees the mass, and sees the motes of beings; his understanding being infinite, is not offendedwith a multitude of things, or distracted with the variety of them; he discerns every thing infinitely more clearly and perfectly thanAdam or Solomon could any one thing in the circle of their knowledge; what knowledge they had, was from him; he hath, therefore,infinitely a more perfect knowledge than they were capable in their natures to receive a communication of. All things are open to him(Heb. 4:13); the least fibre, in its nakedness and distinct frame, is transparent to him, as, by the help of glasses, the mouth, feet, hands,of a small insect, are visible to a man, which seem to the eye, without that assistance, one entire piece, not diversified into parts. Allthe causes, qualities, natures, properties of things, are open to him; “he brings out the host of heaven by number, and calleth them bynames” (Isa. 40:26); he numbers the hairs of our heads: what more distinct than number? Thus God beholds things in every unity,which makes up the heap; he knows, and none else can, every thing in its true and intimate causes, in its original and intermediatecauses; in himself, as the cause of every particular of their being, every property in their being. Knowledge by the causes is the mostnoble and perfect knowledge, and most suited to the infinite excellency of the Divine Being; he created all things, and ordered them toa universal and particular end; he, therefore, knows the essential properties of every thing, every activity of their nature, all theirfitness for those distinct ends, to which he orders them, and for which he governs and disposeth them, and understands their darkest and most hidden qualities infinitely clearer than any eye can behold the clear beams of the sun. Ife knows all things as he made them;he made them distinctly, and therefore knows them distinctly, and that every individual; therefore God is said (Gen. 1:31) to see everything that he had made; he took a review of every particular creature he had made, and upon his view pronounced it good. Topronounce that good, which was not exactly known in every creek, in every mite of its nature, had not consisted with his veracity; forevery one that speaks truth ignorantly, that knows not that he speaks truth, is a liar in speaking that which is true. God knows everyact of his own will, whether it be positive or permissive, and therefore every effect of his will. We must needs ascribe to God a perfectknowledge; but a confused knowledge cannot challenge that title. To know things only in a heap is unworthy of the Divine perfection;for if God knows his own ends in the creation of things, he knows distinctly the means whereby he will bring them to those ends forwhich he hath appointed them: no wise man intends an end, without a knowledge of the means conducing to that end; an ignorance,then, of any thing in the world, which falls under the nature of a means to a Divine end (and there is nothing in the world but doth),would be inconsistent with the perfection of God; it would ascribe to him a blind providence in the world. As there can be nothingimperfect in his being and essence, so there can be nothing imperfect in his understanding and knowledge, and therefore not aconfused knowledge, which is an imperfection. “Darkness and light are both alike to him” (Psalm 139:12); he sees distinctly into theone, as well as the other; what is darkness to us, is not so to him.
 
If one of the contrasting terms is unknown or in doubt, you can study how John uses the other term (darkness) to get a good sense of what he is trying to say. When John contrasts the light of God with darkness, it leads my mind first and foremost to moral purity and truth in the immediate context.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top