Caroline
Puritan Board Sophomore
When someone is doing something that is clearly in error, should you say something? I know that we shouldn't always jump all over someone over every little thing. But I'm often caught between thinking:
(1) it's not helpful to never say anything. I wish people had told me I was wrong more when I used to be a Pentecostal fanatic. People were too nice to do that, and, as a result, I never seriously questioned my beliefs for a long time, because everyone seemed to agree with them. Even those that didn't never really said WHY they didn't. They just got quiet and didn't say much of anything.
(2) Being overly critical can distance people. They may think that every time they open their mouths, you bite their head off. This does not dispose them to talk to you. Everybody is wrong about something.
An example is this: My brother wrote and self-published a book, and he sent me a copy. I'm sure that part of it was that he was trying to evangelize me because my family all considers me lost. The book was Christian fiction (or more like Pentecostal fiction) and it involved this girl who gets saved by the warm fuzzy feeling that she gets when she looks at a picture of Jesus. The Bible enters this book nowhere, nor does repentence from sin. In the end, everybody gets healed and is happy and they hold their worship services by gazing up at the sky.
I responded by commenting that it was nicely written, etc, but had some serious second commandment issues and didn't present the gospel in anything that really resembled the gospel (Jesus dying on the cross for our sins).
I think he was really stung, and I wondered in retrospect if I should have held my tongue for the sake of developing a better relationship with my brother, especially considering how strained family relationships have been (I haven't seen most of them for at least ten years).
What do you do in situations like this? When do you say something or not say something when someone is doing something that they believe is a 'witness'?
(1) it's not helpful to never say anything. I wish people had told me I was wrong more when I used to be a Pentecostal fanatic. People were too nice to do that, and, as a result, I never seriously questioned my beliefs for a long time, because everyone seemed to agree with them. Even those that didn't never really said WHY they didn't. They just got quiet and didn't say much of anything.
(2) Being overly critical can distance people. They may think that every time they open their mouths, you bite their head off. This does not dispose them to talk to you. Everybody is wrong about something.
An example is this: My brother wrote and self-published a book, and he sent me a copy. I'm sure that part of it was that he was trying to evangelize me because my family all considers me lost. The book was Christian fiction (or more like Pentecostal fiction) and it involved this girl who gets saved by the warm fuzzy feeling that she gets when she looks at a picture of Jesus. The Bible enters this book nowhere, nor does repentence from sin. In the end, everybody gets healed and is happy and they hold their worship services by gazing up at the sky.
I responded by commenting that it was nicely written, etc, but had some serious second commandment issues and didn't present the gospel in anything that really resembled the gospel (Jesus dying on the cross for our sins).
I think he was really stung, and I wondered in retrospect if I should have held my tongue for the sake of developing a better relationship with my brother, especially considering how strained family relationships have been (I haven't seen most of them for at least ten years).
What do you do in situations like this? When do you say something or not say something when someone is doing something that they believe is a 'witness'?
Last edited: