Backwoods Presbyterian
Puritanboard Amanuensis
No disrespect to anyone but shouldn't we be posting these that concern instruments on the otha thread?
Maybe a mod could move some of them?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No disrespect to anyone but shouldn't we be posting these that concern instruments on the otha thread?
Music is movement and it is spatial. It moves the listener in time toward a goal and how it does it is its thesis. This is very difficult to explain, but it can be shown; music is a parable. Music is something you walk somebody through. Music can express depth, or superficiality, or loftiness in ways that words cannot. Words bring ideas down to people; music brings people up to the ideas. And if done well, it uplifts the heart to God.
Third and fourth century church fathers are not Scripture and Scripture is clear. The Lord is to be worshipped with instruments; Ps. 150 being but one example. The practice is nowhere explicitly prohibited in the NT, nor is its abolition a necessary consequence of any NT statement.
That said, although instruments can be, and often are a distraction they need not necessarily be one. A wise use of them to ACCOMPANY worship is not only biblically commanded but can help quicken our spirits.
In an instrument discussion Psalm 150, In my humble opinion, is a non-sequitur. Why you ask since it is nothing but instruments?
1) The Psalm, given its context, has nothing to do with NT worship and everything to do with Temple Worship.
2) People who claim that this Psalm is proscriptive for NT worship do not use the instruments supposedly "commanded" in their own worship.
3) If Psalm 150 is commanded, why do you not dance or chant as these are commanded as well?
Temple worship is not mentioned in the psalm; praising God for his mightly acts and excellent greatness are. Only if praising God for his mightly acts and excellent greatness are abolished in the NT can we say this psalm has nothing to do with NT worship.
Some of us do use those instruments: we have a harp (the modern lyre) and trumpets on our worship team.
And we have been known to use liturgical dance on occasion.
If they are commanded to be done in worship should you not, to be consistent, use them all the time?
By the way what/where might be the "Praise God in His sanctuary" referred to in Psalm 150?
A couple good points have been raised. One is that if a hymn book has already been approved by the Elders then the picking of the songs is already fairly delegated. But the matching point is that the songs normally are meant to complement the sermon, so why would a woman be involved in picking them on a normal, practical level?
In my church, the pastor has delegated that responsibility to me, because he admits he is almost clueless when it comes to choosing music, though from time to time he tells me he wants us to sing a particular hymn.
When it comes to music complimenting the sermon, the pastor tells me what passage of Scripture he is preaching each week, and I spend a lot of time in prayer and Bible study on my own before I choose the music. Then I send him a list of the songs and the words for his approval. This works well, and it is unusual when the music and sermon do not compliment one another.