A number of years ago, I asked about Kohlbrugge. I had a pietist friend in Deutschland that had discovered him. I ask about him here on Puritanboard and was told his theology used to be influential in the Eureka Classis. I was also told he was antinomian. I have never seen any evidence of this in the bits of his writings I have found.
My same friend has recently discovered Steenblok. He speaks highly of him. I have not found any of Steenblok's writings in English. A friend with roots in the Heritage Reformed Church said he was hyper-Calvinist, but could not adequately explain how. Another friend, a fellow in the Protestant Reformed Church, dismissed Steenblok as hopelessly mystical.
I know that different people have different definitions of hyper-Calvinist. Another recent thread brought to mind the strong reactions some of the brethren have to anything that smacks of crossing the line into hyper-Calvinism. I am curious why these two theologians have this reputation.