Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would point 1 being involving the push to include women as pastors/teachers?I would think that it involves some if not all of the following:
1. A push for gender egalitarianism in the wake of #MeToo
2. Things like the Revoice conference with evangelicals arguing that same-sex attraction is morally neutral if not actually a positive good so long as you remain celibate.
3. What appears to be an uncritical acceptance of things like Critical Race Theory on the part of some, including a move from calling for racial reconciliation to advocacy of reparations.
If current trends continue, with the crackup of the New Calvinism/YRR, I wonder if evangelicalism in general will actually be worse off than it was before.
there does seem to be a real effort to have traditional Christians viewpoints changed to reflect the cultural norms and ways now.Scott,
I listened to the whole thing and was disturbed. Todd seemed to be on point. This movement is a new liberalism, no doubt. For my part, I will continue to reject it with all vigor, as long as I'm able.......
there does seem to be a real effort to have traditional Christians viewpoints changed to reflect the cultural norms and ways now.
The siren call to being political correct and in tune with modern morals and cultural norms is getting overwhelming.Certainly, this is true, but it is much worse. Theological liberalism is being marketed and sold by professing Christians. At some point, sessions will have to hold members to the "doctrine" part of "doctrine and life"......
the ministers and churches who cave under the pressure would still be preferred to those who changed their views for real.I'm not so sure the "Woke" ministers are caving to political correctness. THat implies at least some (albeit short-lived) resistance. I think they actually believe that stuff.
In other words, hypocrisy is preferable?the ministers and churches who cave under the pressure would still be preferred to those who changed their views for real.
I would see that those who caved in to the pressure would be still true, but wavering in their walk, and need to be corrected and brought back to what they once were, but those who turned away and now really do buy into false doctrines and bad theology are in much worse state.In other words, hypocrisy is preferable?![]()
It doesn't change the substance of what he was addressing on his program.Friel blows it at 8:49 calling those that hold to LBC 1689, 'Reformed'. in my opinion, the term "Classic reformed" would be proper if one were speaking of those Reformers that hold to the 1646 WCF only.
Why?the ministers and churches who cave under the pressure would still be preferred to those who changed their views for real.
the ministers and churches who cave under the pressure would still be preferred to those who changed their views for real.

I think that the real solution to racism issues is not to have whites being shamed for past abuses, but to realize that all of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, and place the bond blacks and whites saved by grace of God now share in Christ.Liberalism is poisoning the Church. None of this is biblical--especially the 'need to repent' of the racism of your grandparents.
After listening to this, I would class myself as classic reformed.
It would seem to be proper to have Reformed Baptists called something like Particular Baptists instead, as know many who are Calvinistic in their theology prefer to use that designation anyways.Friel blows it at 8:49 calling those that hold to LBC 1689, 'Reformed'. in my opinion, the term "Classic reformed" would be proper if one were speaking of those Reformers that hold to the 1646 WCF only.
I view the Christians who buckle under pressure as not really dishonest, but as weak, just as Peter failed to apply what he knew when Paul confronted him.I disagree. I much prefer the company of honest atheists to that of dishonest Christians.
I view the Christians who buckle under pressure as not really dishonest, but as weak, just as Peter failed to apply what he knew when Paul confronted him.
It would seem to be proper to have Reformed Baptists called something like Particular Baptists instead, as know many who are Calvinistic in their theology prefer to use that designation anyways.
They still have right theology, unlike those who completely moved to liberal views, but really need to practice what they preach.But they are preaching the same bottom-line message as the traitors
I see the label change as being helpful in the sense it shows that both sides agree on the main points of the Theology, but there also remains some substantial differences.Whatever name is employed, the distinction is one of category/definition and not of "standing". In other words, it is a term to distinguish beliefs and not to assign a "class" of citizenship. Many of the Baptists here will be far in front of the line of this wicked, vile Presbyterian in the kingdom of God........
I think that the real solution to racism issues is not to have whites being shamed for past abuses, but to realize that all of us have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God, and place the bond blacks and whites saved by grace of God now share in Christ.
That's why I try to bring balancing pressure from the other side. Leave them no place to run, no place to hide. Some find the technique offensive or strident. But we have ample evidence of where "kinder and gentler" leads.I view the Christians who buckle under pressure as not really dishonest, but as weak