Jeff isn't saying that JE wasn't Reformed, but he is asking an important question. He does make a distinction between "narrowly" and "broadly." Jeff's post is worth reading.
Jeff isn't saying that JE wasn't Reformed, but he is asking an important question. He does make a distinction between "narrowly" and "broadly." Jeff's post is worth reading.
Certainly worth reading, and discussing in my opinion.
I suppose it's a question of just how "narrowly" we define "Reformed." Must one be Presbyterian to be Reformed? Historically, the answer is no. But, if we define reformed as "holding to the WCF", then it has to be yes. It's just a shame how many get left out of being "reformed" if that is how narrowly we define the term.
If someone will explain to me how to post a new thread (I go away away and someone changed the locks eh?) I'll post cover art and link for a new book that explores this question in some depth.
If someone will explain to me how to post a new thread (I go away away and someone changed the locks eh?) I'll post cover art and link for a new book that explores this question in some depth.