Can a Christian in good conscience open a pub....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally posted by biblelighthouse
Why not open a Christian-owned pub, with Christian-based rules? Simply DON'T ALLOW drunkenness, half-naked women, lude music, etc.

I guess that precludes my former roommate from "opening a pub..." We had all of the above, and a threat of eviction! I loathed my situation.
 
Originally posted by biblelighthouse
Michael,

Who says a Christian has to run a pub just like everyone else?

Why not open a Christian-owned pub, with Christian-based rules? Simply DON'T ALLOW drunkenness, half-naked women, lude music, etc.

Enforce the correct rules, and I think you could create an excellent Christian pub that would honor the Lord!

Bolderdash!
 
You know guys, I suppose I like the 16th and 17th centuries better than most. I even, with you, pine for the "œglory" days. It is nice to talk about these subjects in the sanctified and sanitized confines of a board such as this. There are, however, stark realities about the present zeitgeist that so completely mitigate against such a plan that it will not and cannot fly in our generation or in our day. You know it! We love the thirteenth century laws. I even drink Beck´s Dark because it is the beer that Martin Luther drank:D . It´s true! Look on the bottle and it will say "œBrewed under the German purity law of 1516". That is close enough to 1517 for me. Anyway, whether we like it or not our weaker brethren you are not thinking of. It is certainly a lack of love in the very least that would be demonstrated by such an absurd suggestion as a Christian pub that can glorify the Lord. Really. I know every one of you and you and am convinced it would be an utter failure in attaining the goal. It might not be you that causes the problem, but it would be someone. Oh, and please, do not give me the argument that we cannot allow the weaker brother to set the bounds of our liberty. He is exactly the one who does set the bounds of your liberty.

Romans 14:15-2115 But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died. 16 Let not then your good be evil spoken of: 17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. 18 For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men. 19 Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another. 20 For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence. 21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.
:book2:
 
I don't see why Christians should categorically not be allowed to own businesses whose main source of revenue is alcoholic beverages to be consumed on the premises.

Should Christians also not go to bars?
 
Originally posted by Michael Butterfield
You know guys, I suppose I like the 16th and 17th centuries better than most. I even, with you, pine for the "œglory" days. It is nice to talk about these subjects in the sanctified and sanitized confines of a board such as this. There are, however, stark realities about the present zeitgeist that so completely mitigate against such a plan that it will not and cannot fly in our generation or in our day. You know it! We love the thirteenth century laws. I even drink Beck´s Dark because it is the beer that Martin Luther drank:D . It´s true! Look on the bottle and it will say "œBrewed under the German purity law of 1516". That is close enough to 1517 for me. Anyway, whether we like it or not our weaker brethren you are not thinking of. It is certainly a lack of love in the very least that would be demonstrated by such an absurd suggestion as a Christian pub that can glorify the Lord. Really. I know every one of you and you and am convinced it would be an utter failure in attaining the goal. It might not be you that causes the problem, but it would be someone. Oh, and please, do not give me the argument that we cannot allow the weaker brother to set the bounds of our liberty. He is exactly the one who does set the bounds of your liberty.

Romans 14:15-2115 But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died. 16 Let not then your good be evil spoken of: 17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. 18 For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God, and approved of men. 19 Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another. 20 For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offence. 21 It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor any thing whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.
:book2:

Michael, your post made me think of something but i don't want to derail this thread so i hope you don't mind if i make your post a springboard for another topic.
 
Originally posted by tdowns007
we open one,
The Puritan's Pub!!!! We can all post in the puritan's pub while drinking in it as well. lol;)

Wait a minute ! ! ! That was our idea !

The jukebox could be full of Christian music . . . there could even be a jukebox "Psalter only" night for the EP drinking crowd.

Christian music. hmmmmmm. If you mean CCM, I am so going to barf. :lol:
 
I think the detractors of this idea assume that a "Bar" inherently attracts immoral, flambouantly immoral, people.

What makes a bar is the "social norms" that are established inside, led by the owners and employees, and ratified by the clientele.

When idiots come in with their loud raucous and boisterous conduct, if its frowned upon, they either "conform", or leave. A Pub could easily build the clientele and atmosphere it seeks if it proactively steers the ship everyday and chops away everything indecent and reinforces those things that are good.

If people like "games", then they go to a sports bar. If they like "bumping and grinding", they go to a "party" bar.

And if "cheating" is what people are into, they can do that anywhere. A Christian Pub would be no more conducive to that than anywhere else.

There is no reason why Christian ownership couldn't foster an atmosphere of fun, relaxation, and good conversation, and serve his/her community by offering great customer service and quality of product in this arena. If Pubs were meant to be enjoyed in ages past, the same can be true today.

However, the original question asked about "from a strictly business standpoint", on which I don't think it is a very good idea. When you want to cater to Christians, its the pop evangelicalism that has all the money simply because the numbers are so large. To market a bar like this to Reformation-minded individuals would probably be inefficient; there simply is not a great enough concentration of them to be your potential clients.
 
Adolph Coors IV (?) is an evangelical, but I don't know what flavor. That could be who you're thinking of, Andrew. I don't think he has any connection with the family business anymore.
 
Originally posted by alwaysreforming
I think the detractors of this idea assume that a "Bar" inherently attracts immoral, flambouantly immoral, people.

What makes a bar is the "social norms" that are established inside, led by the owners and employees, and ratified by the clientele.

When idiots come in with their loud raucous and boisterous conduct, if its frowned upon, they either "conform", or leave. A Pub could easily build the clientele and atmosphere it seeks if it proactively steers the ship everyday and chops away everything indecent and reinforces those things that are good.

. . . .

This is exactly what happens in a bar. They inherently attract . . .
 
The White Horse Tavern in Cambridge, England is generally considered to the birthplace of the Cambridge wing of English Puritanism.

By 1526, regular (rather subversive) theological discussions were being conducted in the White Horse Tavern in Cambridge. Participants included such future luminaries as Thomas Bilney, Hugh Latimer, Nicholas Ridley, and Thomas Cranmer. Every one of the four was later martyred.
 
Originally posted by VirginiaHuguenot


By 1526, regular (rather subversive) theological discussions were being conducted in the White Horse Tavern in Cambridge. Participants included such future luminaries as Thomas Bilney, Hugh Latimer, Nicholas Ridley, and Thomas Cranmer. Every one of the four was later martyred.
WOW
 
Originally posted by VirginiaHuguenot
The White Horse Tavern in Cambridge, England is generally considered to the birthplace of the Cambridge wing of English Puritanism.

By 1526, regular (rather subversive) theological discussions were being conducted in the White Horse Tavern in Cambridge. Participants included such future luminaries as Thomas Bilney, Hugh Latimer, Nicholas Ridley, and Thomas Cranmer. Every one of the four was later martyred.

One should never say never, so I won't. But that 16th century example is not likely to happen in the 21st century.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top