Daniel 9:24-27 - The Seventy Weeks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Puritanhead

Puritan Board Professor
I am interested what some of the Reformers, Puritans, etc. have to say about Daniel, specifically verse 27. I am already familiar with Calvin and Henry on these passages. I was interested if anyone knew off-hand of any online resources on this subject matter.

I am also interested in critiques of dispensational interpretation.
 
Dispensational's Claim it is anti-Christ who makes the Covenant not Messiah hence the mid trib compact as opposed to Christ's 3.5 year ministry before being cut off.
 
Here are a few resources for consideration:

1599 Geneva Bible:

9:24 Seventy p weeks are determined upon q thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the r transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.

(p) He alludes to Jeremiah´s prophecy, who prophesied that their captivity would be seventy years: but now God´s mercy would exceed his judgment seven times as much, which would be 490 years, even until the coming of Christ, and so then it would continue forever.
(q) Meaning Daniel´s nation, over whom he was careful.
(r) To show mercy and to put sin out of remembrance.

9:25 Know therefore and understand, [that] from s the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince [shall be] seven t weeks, and u threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

(s) That is, from the time that Cyrus gave them permission to depart.
(t) These weeks make forty-nine years, of which forty-six are referred to the time of the building of the temple, and three to the laying of the foundation.
(u) Counting from the sixth year of Darius, who gave the second commandment for the building of the temple are sixty-two weeks, which make 434 years, which comprehend the time from the building of the temple until the baptism of Christ.

9:26 And after threescore and two x weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but y not for himself: and the people of the z prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof [shall be] with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

(x) In this week of the seventy, will Christ come and preach and suffer death.
(y) He will seem to have no beauty, nor to be of any estimation; (Isaiah 53:2).
(z) Meaning Titus, Vespasians´s son, who would come and destroy both the temple, and the people, without any hope of recovery.

9:27 And he a shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to b cease, c and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make [it] desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

(a) By the preaching of the Gospel he affirmed his promise, first to the Jews, and after to the Gentiles.
(b) Christ accomplished this by his death and resurrection.
(c) Meaning that Jerusalem and the sanctuary would be utterly destroyed because of their rebellion against God, and their idolatry: or as some read, that the plague will be so great, that they will all be astonished at them.

1646 Westminster Confession:

Chap. 8
5. The Lord Jesus, by his perfect obedience and sacrifice of himself, which he through the eternal Spirit once offered up unto God, hath fully satisfied the justice of his Father,a and purchased not only reconciliation, but an everlasting inheritance in the kingdom of heaven, for all those whom the Father hath given unto him.b

a. Rom 3:25-26; 5:19; Eph 5:2; Heb 9:14, 16; 10:14. "¢ b. Dan 9:24, 26; John 17:2; Eph 1:11, 14; Col 1:19-20; Heb 9:12, 15.

Chap. 11
3. Christ, by his obedience and death, did fully discharge the debt of all those that are thus justified, and did make a proper, real, and full satisfaction to his Father's justice in their behalf.a Yet inasmuch as he was given by the Father for them,b and his obedience and satisfaction accepted in their stead,c and both freely, not for anything in them, their justification is only of free grace;d that both the exact justice and rich grace of God might be glorified in the justification of sinners.e

a. Isa 53:4-6, 10-12; Dan 9:24, 26; Rom 5:8-10, 19; 1 Tim 2:5-6; Heb 10:10, 14. "¢ b. Rom 8:32. "¢ c. Mat 3:17; 2 Cor 5:21; Eph 5:2. "¢ d. Rom 3:24; Eph 1:7. "¢ e. Rom 3:26; Eph 2:7.

Chap. 19
3. Beside this law, commonly called moral, God was pleased to give to the people of Israel, as a Church under age, ceremonial laws, containing several typical ordinances, partly of worship, prefiguring Christ, his graces, actions, sufferings, and benefits;a and partly holding forth divers instructions of moral duties.b All which ceremonial laws are now abrogated under the New Testament.c

a. Gal 4:1-3; Col 2:17; Heb 9 throughout; 10:1. "¢ b. 1 Cor 5:7; 2 Cor 6:17; Jude 1:23. "¢ c. Dan 9:27; Eph 2:15-16; Col 2:14, 16-17.

Westminster Larger Catechism:

Q71: How is justification an act of God's free grace?
A71: Although Christ, by his obedience and death, did make a proper, real, and full satisfaction to God's justice in the behalf of them that are justified;[1] yet inasmuch as God accepteth the satisfaction from a surety, which he might have demanded of them, and did provide this surety, his own only Son,[2] imputing his righteousness to them,[3] and requiring nothing of them for their justification but faith,[4] which also is his gift,[5] their justification is to them of free grace.[6]

1. Rom. 5:8-10, 19
2. II Tim. 2:5-6; Heb. 7:22; 10:10; Matt. 20:28; Dan. 9:24, 26; Isa. 53:4-6, 10-12; Rom. 8:32; I Peter 1:18-19
3. II Cor. 5:21
4. Rom. 3:24-25
5. Eph. 2:8
6. Eph. 1:7

Zacharius Ursinus, Commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism, pp. 492-493:

III. To What Extent has Christ Abrogated the Law, and To What Extent is it Still in Force?

The ordinary and correct answer to this question is, that the ceremonial and judicial law, as given by Moses, has been abrogated in as far as it relates to obedience; and that the moral law has also been abrogated as it respects the curse, but not as it respects obedience. That the ceremonial and judicial laws have been so abrogated by the coming of Christ, that they no longer bind any to obedience, and that they have not the appearance and force of laws in respect to the present time, is proven, 1. From the fact that the prophets even declared and foretold this abrogation in the Old Testament. "Christ shall confirm the covenant with many for one week, and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease." "Thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchisedec." (Dan 9:27; Ps 110:4.)

Fisher's Catechism:

Q. 21.4. By what names did they speak of his coming?

A. By a variety of names, such as Shiloh, Gen 49:10; Messiah, Dan 9:25; Immanuel, Isa 7:14; the Branch, Zech 6:12; the Messenger of the covenant, Mal 3:1; and several others.

Q. 21.8. What silencing questions may be put to the Jews, who assert that the Messiah is not yet come in the flesh?

A. They may be asked, Where is the sceptre of civil government, which was not to depart from Judah until Shiloh came, according to Gen 49:10? Where is the second temple, into which the Messiah was to come, and to make the glory of it greater than the glory of the former, in his personal appearance in it, according to Hag 2:9?

Where is the sacrifice and oblation, now offered? has it not long since ceased, according to Dan 9:27? And where is the family of David, out of which Christ was to spring, according to Isa 11:1? is it not now quite extinct? They are utterly incapable of answering any of these.

Q. 33.51. What is the difference between the imputation of our sins to Christ, and the imputation of his righteousness to us?

A. Our sins were imputed to Christ as our Surety, only for a time, that he might take them away; but his righteousness is imputed to us to abide with us for ever; hence called an everlasting righteousness, Dan 9:24.

Q. 40.92. How do you prove that the ceremonial law was abolished by the death and satisfaction of Christ?

A. From the utter destruction, many ages since, of the temple at Jerusalem, where only it was lawful to offer sacrifices; which adorable Providence would never have permitted, if these ceremonial institutions had been intended to subsist after the death of Christ, of whom it was foretold that he should "cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease," Dan 9:27. See also Jer 3:16: "In those days, saith the Lord, they shall say no more, The ark of the covenant of the Lord; neither shall it come to mind, neither shall they remember it, neither shall they visit it, neither shall that be done any more."

Q. 43&44.23. In what respects did the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt resemble our spiritual redemption by Christ?

A. The Israelites were made to serve the Egyptians with rigour, Exod 1:14; so sinners, by nature, are under the most cruel bondage and servitude to sin and Satan, 2 Pet 2:19; the Israelites were not able of themselves to shake off the Egyptian yoke, Exod 2:23; no more are sinners of mankind capable of extricating themselves from a state of spiritual slavery in which they are naturally inthralled, Rom 5:6: the Israelites were brought out of Egypt, with a strong hand and a stretched out arm, Ps 136:12; so are we, out of our spiritual thraldom, by the mighty power of God, Ps 110:2-3: the Egyptians were destroyed, when Israel was delivered, Exod 14:28; so principalities and powers were spoiled, Col 2:15, transgression finished, Dan 9:24, and death unstinged, 1 Cor 15:55, when our redemption was accomplished, 1 Cor 15:57.

Jonathan Edwards, Works, Vol. II, Types of the Messiah, p. 672:

Again there is clear proof, that the legal sacrifices were types of the great sacrifice of the Messiah in Dan 9:24, "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy;" taken together with Dan 9:27, "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week, and in the midst of the week shall he cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease." What is translated in Dan 9:24, "And to make an end of sins," might have been translated, "He shall seal up the sin-offerings." The word translated sins in the original is Chattaoth, the very same word that is made use of in the law of Moses, to signify sin-offerings. So that the word might as well be translated sin-offerings here as there. And it is the more likely, that sin-offerings should be meant here, because the word is in the plural number; whereas if what was intended was the same with iniquity in the clause preceding, and transgression in the clause following, thus varying the expression for eloquence sake, it would be more likely this word would have been in the singular number as those are. And besides it is the more likely that the word signifies sin-offerings, because it is evident that this text is a prophecy of the sacrifice that the Messiah should offer for sin. In the next words it is said, "He shall make reconciliation for iniquity." [Dan 9:24] The word rendered reconciliation (as has been already observed) signifies expiation by sacrifice; it being the same that is so often rendered atonement in the law of Moses, when speaking of sacrifices for sin. But what argues yet more strongly that this should have been translated, he shall make an end, or seal up, sin-offerings, is, that in Dan 9:24 there seems to be a reference to what had been said before in this verse, when it is said, In the midst of the week, or in the half of the week, he shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease. In Dan 9:24 it had been said, that the sacrifices or sin-offerings should be made an end of or sealed up in seventy weeks; and Dan 9:25-27 are evidently exegetical of Dan 9:24, to explain how the anointed Holy One or Messiah should make atonement for iniquity, and seal up the sin-offering and sacrifices in seventy weeks, viz. from the commandment to build Jerusalem there should be seven weeks and threescore and two weeks, that is, 69 weeks, and then in the remaining week he should establish the covenant with many, and in the half of the week he should make the sacrifice and oblation to cease, or make an end of the sin-offerings, as was said before. Now let us mind the expression; the word translated make an end, in the original is he shall seal up. "He shall seal up the sin-offerings." It is the very same word that is used in the following clause concerning vision and prophecy. "He shall seal up the vision and prophecy." The same word being thus used twice in like manner, in different clauses of the same sentence, once concerning the vision and prophecy, and the other time concerning the sin-offering, there is all reason to understand it in both places in the same sense. But the plain meaning of that clause, to seal up the vision and prophecy, is this; then shall be accomplished the grand event so often exhibited by the prophecies of the prophets, and so often represented and signified by the visions which they saw, and so the vision and prophecy shall be finished and brought to their grand accomplishment; that which they ultimately aimed at. Then shall be fulfilled the sum of what was signified in the vision and prophecy. (Ezek 28:12, "Thou sealest up the sum full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.") So when in the same sentence it is said, to seal up the sin-offerings, and make atonement for iniquity, we must in a like sense understand it thus, to offer that grand sacrifice or atonement for iniquity, that is so much exhibited and represented by the sin-offerings. So that the sin-offerings shall be made to cease, their design being obtained and finished, that grand event, that great and true atonement for sin, which was aimed at in them, and which they all signified and represented, being now accomplished.

The Destruction of Jerusalem an irresistible Proof of the Divine Origin of Christianity (Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of Education, 1840):

In prophetical language, a day is reckoned for a year, or seven years to every prophetical week. This key is given us by Moses, Lev 25:8, and Num 14:34: and also by Ezekiel, Ezek 4:5-6; and by this it appears, that from the commission granted to Ezra to rebuild Jerusalem, until the complete restoration of the city, there were exactly forty-nine years, or seven weeks. From this period until the first proclamation of the Messiah by John the Baptist, there were exactly four hundred and thirty-four years, or sixty-two weeks. John's ministry terminated at the end of three years and a half, when our Lord began to preach "the kingdom of God," and thus virtually, "in the midst of the week, caused the sacrifice and oblation to cease;" (see Dan 9:27) for he himself declared that "the law and the prophets (that is, the ceremonial law"”or law of sacrifices, etc., and the prophets under it) were until John; since that time the kingdom of God is preached." And exactly at the end of this prophetical week, that is, at the expiration of the remaining three years and a half, he confirmed the abolition of the Levitical law by the "one offering of himself" upon the cross. This ever-memorable event happened precisely in the very month which completed the four hundred and ninety years, or whole period of seventy weeks, mentioned by Daniel in Dan 9:24; and it deserves the particular attention of the reader, that Ferguson, the celebrated astronomer, who applied the principles of his favourite science to this very prediction of Daniel, declares, as the result of his calculations, that "prophetic year of Messiah's being cut off was the very same as the astronomical!"

Matthew Poole:

Dan 9:24. Seventy weeks: these weeks are weeks of days, and these days are so many years; though neither days, nor months, nor years are expressed, (which makes it somewhat the more obscure,) but weeks only. It is yet plain and obvious that the angel useth the number seventy to show the favour of God towards them, that they might have so much liberty and joy as their seventy years' bondage and sufferings amounted to. Yet was this but a type of the time of grace which was to follow after by the coming of Christ. Upon thy people, and upon thy holy city. Why doth he call them Daniel's people? 1. Because they were his by nation, blood, laws, and profession. 2. Thine because thou dost own them, and art so tender of them, and so zealous for them. To finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity. Note, 1. The angel discovers first the disease, in three several words, h)#h Nw( (#p which contain all sorts of sin, which the Messiah should free us from by his full redemption, see Exod 34:6-7; Matt 1:21 viz. original, actual, of ignorance, presumption, etc.; also fault and punishment, which we may prove by Scripture. 2. The angel shows us also the cure of this disease in three words, le callee, le chatem, le capper: 1. To finish transgression; 2. To make an end of sin; 3. To make reconciliation: all which words are very significant in the original, and signify to pardon, to blot out, mortify, expiate. To bring in everlasting righteousness, i.e. to bring in justification by the free grace of God in Jesus Christ the Lord our Righteousness, Isa 53:6; Jer 23:6; Jer 33:16; 1 Cor 1:30; called everlasting because Christ is eternal, and he and his righteousness is everlasting. Christ brings this in, 1. By his merit; 2. By his gospel declaring it; 3. By faith applying and sealing it by the Holy Ghost. To seal up the vision and prophecy; to abrogate the former dispensation of the laws, and to fulfil it, and the prophecies relating to Christ, and to confirm and ratify the new testament or gospel covenant of grace. The Talmud saith, all the prophecies of the prophets related to Christ. To anoint the most Holy; by which alluding to the holy of holies, which was anointed, Exod 30:25-31; Exod 40:9-16. This typified the church, which is called anointed, 2 Cor 1:21, and heaven, into which Christ is entered, Heb 8:1; Heb 9:24; Heb 10:19; but chiefly Christ himself, who is the Holy One, Acts 3:14. He received the Spirit without measure, John 3:34. His human nature is therefore called the temple, John 2:19, and tabernacle, Heb 8:2; Heb 9:11: moreover Christ is he that held the law, by which the will of God is revealed; the propitiatory, appeasing God; the table, that nourisheth us; the candlestick, that enlightens; the altar, that sanctifies the gift and offering. All these were anointed and holy: by this word anointing he alludes to his name Messiah and Christ, both which signify anointed. Christ was anointed at his first conception and personal union, Luke 1:35; in his baptism, Matt 3:17; to his three offices by the Holy Ghost, (1.) King, Matt 2:2, (2.) Prophet, Isa 61:1, (3.) Priest, Ps 110:4.

Dan 9:25. Know therefore and understand, i.e. by deep consideration, upon a due search of reason, and comparing of things, and minding what the angel saith. Seven weeks from the publication of the edict, whether of Cyrus or Darius, to restore and to build, we shall see anon. Even in troublous times; noting the enemy should create them much trouble in the building and reparations of the wall, city, and temple, which they did many ways, as we read in Nehemiah, which the Spirit of God doth premonish them of, lest they should think this their chief deliverance and redemption. These seven weeks are therefore mentioned by themselves, and repeated no more, because they contained the time of building the wall, city, and temple of Jerusalem, at the end of which seem to begin the sixty-two weeks.

Dan 9:26. After the threescore and two weeks, i.e. after the seven before, and after the sixty-two that followed them, which all make up sixty-nine, referring the angel's seventy weeks, which is nothing though no week more be described, because it makes up the number a round number, after the Jewish manner of calculation, and there might be some fragments in the particular reckoning to make up the sum, or it might be finished in the seventieth week, and that was enough to call it seventy weeks, Dan 9:24. Shall Messiah be cut off; which word hrk signifies cutting off, or cutting down, as a tree, Isa 44:14; Jer 10:3. Secondly, it is used for cutting off by capital punishment, Exod 12:15; Exod 30:33,38; whether this be by the signal hand of God, or by the magistrate, for some heinous offence, Lev 18:29; Lev 20:17; Ps 37:34. This foreshows that the death of Christ should be as of a condemned malefactor sentenced to death, and that justly. So did the Jews, Christ's executioners, proclaim that he died for blasphemy, and that he was a devilish impostor, etc. Yea, God himself charged sin upon him and the curse, Isa 53:4; 2 Cor 5:21; Gal 3:13. But not for himself; wl Ny)w which being abrupt, is variously rendered and read; some referring it to Christ, and some to the people: and others to both, and all with very probable conjectures, Ps 22:6-7; Isa 53:3: i.e. not to him: There was none to succour him; or that they would none of him for their Messiah; they set him at nought, and would not have him live, and therefore he would not own them for his people, but cast them off, for thus dying is expressed in short, not to be. Thus Enoch, Gen 5:24, Joseph, Gen 42:36, and Rachel's children, Jer 31:15; Matt 2:17-18. But our English translation seems to hit the truest sense, i.e. not for himself. He was innocent and guiltless, he died for others, not for himself, but for our sakes and for our salvation. The people of the prince that shall come; the Romans under the conduct of Titus Vespantianus. Some will include Christ's people here, whom he should chiefly gather out of the Roman empire, should ruin that church, and polity, and worship. Desolations are determined; God hath decreed to destroy that place and people by the miseries and desolations of war, i.e. sword, famine, sickness, scattering. All this is signified by shomemoth: also the profaning of the temple by idols, which are called abominations that make desolate; this was done by the Greeks and Jews before, and the Romans at their siege, and after. Question. But some will query, why the angel who was sent to comfort Daniel should insert here this tragical business of destruction and desolation, being beyond the space of seventy weeks? Answer 1. That Daniel might be informed of the judgments of God upon that place and people, and the reasons of it, viz. their rejecting and killing Christ. 2. That the spirit of God's people should not fail when these tragedies were acted; being foretold, thereby they were prepared and fortified against it, and to expect it, and not to be surprised by it when it came.

Dan 9:27. He: this he is not Titus making truce with the Jews, which he did not, though he endeavoured to persuade them that he might spare them. I say then with Graser, Mede, and others, that this he is the Messiah, and the covenant he confirms is the new testament or covenant, called therefore the covenant of the people, Isa 42:6; Isa 49:8; and the Angel of the covenant, Mal 3:1; and the Surety of the covenant, Heb 7:22; and the ancient rabbins called the Messias Mygyg #y) a middle man, or middle man between two. Question. How did Christ confirm the covenant? Answer 1. By testimony, (1.) Of angels, Luke 2:10; Matt 28; (2.) John Baptist; (3.) Of the wise men; (4.) By the saints then living, Luke 1:2; (5.) Moses and Elias, Matt 17:3; (6.) Pharisees, as Nicodemus, John 3:2; (7.) The devils that confessed him. 2. By his preaching. 3. By signs and wonders. 4. By his holy life. 5. By his resurrection and ascension. 6. By his death and blood shed. Shall confirm the covenant; rybgh he shall corroborate it, as if it began before his coming to fail and be invalid. With many; noting hereby the paucity of the Jewish church and nation, compared with the great increase and enlargement by believing Gentiles throughout all nations and ages of the world, Isa 11:9; Isa 49:6; Isa 53:11-12; Isa 54:2-3; Mark 16:15; Acts 13:46: q.d. With many Jews first and last, and with many more of the nations, yea, with the many whom the rabbins and Pharisees despise as the rabble, the common people, Isa 42:3; Matt 21:31; John 7:48-49; 1 Cor 1:26-27. For one week; by a figure, take the greater part of the whole, he shall, though rejected by the chief and bulk of the Jewish nation, yet make the new testament prevail with many in that time, i.e. at the latter end of the seventy weeks. The sacrifice and the oblation to cease; zebach and mincha, bloody and unbloody, to cease, i.e. all the Jewish rites, and Levitical ceremonious worship, i.e. by the burning of the temple before the city was taken, for they were only to offer sacrifice in the temple, nor had they wherewithal in the siege. Yet is there more in it than this, viz. that the Lord Jesus, by his death, and by the execution of his wrath, and abrogate and put an end to this laborious service, and made it to cease for ever. For the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate; desolate for the wing, for the manifold and great abominations stretching, and our text hath it well overspreading. This abomination was the Roman army with their eagles, and with their superstitious rites in approaching to besiege and subdue any place; and this is executed by Christ upon them, Matt 22:7, when he is called a King sending forth his armies, and destroying the murderers that destroyed him, and burning their city, and their coming is Christ's coming, Mal 3:1-2; John 21:22; James 5:7; therefore it is said here, he shall make it desolate. Even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate: here all this is made the effect of God's decree, and therefore irrevocable. This word shomen notes that this people were bewitched, sottishly superstitious, wanderers, banished, the astonishment and scorn of the world; all which did justly and dreadfully befall them, and they verify it to this day.

They that will curiously search further into the seventy weeks and other numbers in Daniel, and have leisure and skill, let them read Graserus, L'Empereur, Wasmuth, Mede, Willet, Wichmannus, Sanctius, Rainoldus, Pererius, Derodon, Broughton, Liveleius, Helvicus, Calovius, Geierus, etc. Read also Joseph Med., p. 861, etc., and Bail., p. 180, etc. This scripture shows the coming of the Messiah so clearly, his sufferings, and the wrath of God so severely upon the Jews for it, that it thoroughly confutes their unbelief; and fully confirms our faith in Jesus Christ.

Charles Spurgeon, Morning and Evening:

Evening, January 16

"The Messiah shall be cut off, but not for himself.""”Dan 9:26

Blessed be his name, there was no cause of death in him. Neither original nor actual sin had defiled him, and therefore death had no claim upon him. No man could have taken his life from him justly, for he had done no man wrong, and no man could even have slain him by force unless he had been pleased to yield himself to die. But lo, one sins and another suffers. Justice was offended by us, but found its satisfaction in him. Rivers of tears, mountains of offerings, seas of the blood of bullocks, and hills of frankincense, could not have availed for the removal of sin; but Jesus was cut off for us, and the cause of wrath was cut off at once, for sin was put away for ever. Herein is wisdom, whereby substitution, the sure and speedy way of atonement, was devised! Herein is condescension, which brought Messiah, the Prince, to wear a crown of thorns, and die upon the cross! Herein is love, which led the Redeemer to lay down his life for his enemies!

It is not enough, however, to admire the spectacle of the innocent bleeding for the guilty, we must make sure of our interest therein. The special object of the Messiah's death was the salvation of his church; have we a part and a lot among those for whom he gave his life a ransom? Did the Lord Jesus stand as our representative? Are we healed by his stripes? [Isa 53:5; 1 Pet 2:24] It will be a terrible thing indeed if we should come short of a portion in his sacrifice; it were better for us that we had never been born. Solemn as the question is, it is a joyful circumstance that it is one which may be answered clearly and without mistake. To all who believe on him the Lord Jesus is a present Saviour, and upon them all the blood of reconciliation has been sprinkled. Let all who trust in the merit of Messiah's death be joyful at every remembrance of him, and let their holy gratitude lead them to the fullest consecration to his cause.

William Jay, Morning Exercises:

OCTOBER 30

"Messiah the Prince.""”Dan 9:25

This is not the only character of the Messiah. But we must connect it with every representation we have of him, that his glory may not be injured by his condescension, nor his authority diminished by his kindness. Is he exalted at the right hand of God? It is to be "a Prince," as well as "a Saviour." Is he a Priest? He is "a Priest upon his throne."

How is this Prince designated?

He is "the Prince of the kings of the earth." They often think little of him, and imagining themselves their own, say, Who is Lord over us? But wherein they deal proudly, he is above them. They are all raised by his power; they are all controllable by his will; they are all subservient to his designs; they are all amenable to his tribunal. Hence his avowal, "By me kings reign, and princes decree justice. By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth." Hence the admonition, "Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him."

He is "the Prince of peace." He came to mediate between heaven and earth, and we are reconciled unto God by the death of his Son. Men talk of making their peace with God. If our tears, or works, or alms could have availed for this purpose, the world would never have witnessed the sufferings of Christ. But he made peace by the blood of his cross. One died for all: and he was more than all. The value of his sacrifice was infinite; and every end that could have been answered by the destruction of a world of sinners, has been equally and better answered by the death of the Saviour. Nothing will effectually satisfy an awakened conscience but what satisfied the justice of God. But surely this will suffice. When, therefore, it is apprehended and applied by faith, we enter into rest, and feel a peace within which passeth all understanding. By his grace, too, he reconciles us to our duty and to our condition. He frees us from those anxieties and fears which an idolatrous regard to creatures excites, and enables us to be careful for nothing by casting all our care upon him, who careth for us. Also by subduing our pride and selfishness, by which alone come contention, and inspiring us with love, the bond of perfectness, we live in harmony with our fellow-creatures. Yea, we are in league with the stones of the field; and the beasts of the field are at peace with us.

He is "the Prince of life." Other princes, however powerful, are mortal; and this is a reason why we should not put our trust in them: their breath goeth forth, they return to their dust; in that very day their thoughts perish. But Jesus liveth for ever; and because he lives, his people live also. Other princes, while they are living themselves, cannot impart life to others; though, alas, they often take it away, and sacrifice thousands of their subjects to their own lusts. But Jesus had not only life in himself, but came that we might have life, and have it more abundantly. He procured, and he communicates and sustains a life superior to that of Adam in paradise, and to that of angels in glory. This is the promise that God hath promised us, even eternal life. And this life is in his Son . He therefore that hath the Son hath life, and he that hath not the Son hath not life.

He has other designations, and all come short of his praise. But these are sufficient to show how safe and how happy all they are who have become his subjects. It was a fine compliment that Hiram paid Solomon, when he said, "Surely because the Lord loved Israel, therefore made he thee king over them." How much more has God shown his goodness to his people, in setting this King over his holy hill of Zion. Let the children of Zion be joyful in their King. Let them make their boast in the Lord, and in his righteousness be exalted.

Let them also be concerned to approve themselves wise and good and loyal subjects to the best of princes; so that instead of disgracing him, they may be to him for a name and a praise among all those who shall hear of so great a people.

But woe to those who reject his sceptre. "As for these mine enemies, who would not that I should reign over them, bring them forth, and slay them before me."

See also William Symington's Messiah the Prince.
 
Originally posted by Puritanhead
I am interested what some of the Reformers, Puritans, etc. have to say about Daniel, specifically verse 27. I am already familiar with Calvin and Henry on these passages. I was interested if anyone knew off-hand of any online resources on this subject matter.

I am also interested in critiques of dispensational interpretation.
Our OT scripture reading has been in Daniel; the pastor covered chapter 9 on 8-13, and the audio is here. Exposition starts at 6:50 after the reading.
Also see the audio for when the pastor preached on Daniel 9 from a series on the book, here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top