Doug Kelly Systematic Theology lectures?

[RamistThomist]

Do these lectures still exist? I know many ITunesU courses went into the void when ITunesU shut down. Is there a backup file for these audio lectures somewhere?

 

[ZackF]

I don’t know if it is what you’re looking for but the RTS app has a bunch.

 

[Taylor]

I downloaded all of them when TNARS had them on their syllabi. I’m not sure what happened to TNARS, but I have the lectures on my Google Drive here.

 

[arapahoepark]

I downloaded all of them when TNARS had them on their syllabi. I’m not sure what happened to TNARS, but I have the lectures on my Google Drive here.

It turned into Log College and Seminary.
Jacob, you may be able to access them here

 

[yeutter]

I’m not sure what happened to TNARS,

TNARS has morphed into Log Cabin College and Seminary

Continuing a legacy of Reformed education, experientialism, & evangelism

logcollege.net

 

[RamistThomist]

Thanks. I got a few of them on the RTS app.

 

[TheInquirer]

Is there anything in particular you are looking for? Happy to go through old class notes if you are trying to find something.

 

[RamistThomist]

Is there anything in particular you are looking for? Happy to go through old class notes if you are trying to find something.

Thank you. I was looking for anything he might have said on epistemology and prolegomena and that kind of stuff.

 

[TheInquirer]

Systematic Theology I:

1) Lesson 1 - meaning of theology, knowledge of God in general, systematic theology and how it works and basis for it
2) Lesson 2 - Reformed theological approach, phenomenon of man's natural religiousness, contrasts with Marxist, secularist, and humanistic explanations; standard explanation on revelation and its types (special/general)
3) Lesson 3 - inspiration, inerrancy, and perspicuity - fairly basic discussion
4) Lesson 4 - knowability of God - internal and external witnesses to God (longish Torrence quote here on how the evidence of God differs from other objects of knowledge)
5) Lessons 5-7 - Trinitarian topics
6) Lesson 8 - attributes of God
7) Lesson 9 - Divine Decrees
8) Lesson 10 - Creation and Providence
9) Lesson 11 - Anthropology and Covenants

Systematic Theology II:

- These are all doctrine of the church

Systematic Theology III:

- Christology, Soteriology, Eschatology

Looks like Systematic I, Lessons 1-4 are maybe what you're after.

Let me know if I can provide additional info.

 

[RamistThomist]

Systematic Theology I:

1) Lesson 1 - meaning of theology, knowledge of God in general, systematic theology and how it works and basis for it
2) Lesson 2 - Reformed theological approach, phenomenon of man's natural religiousness, contrasts with Marxist, secularist, and humanistic explanations; standard explanation on revelation and its types (special/general)
3) Lesson 3 - inspiration, inerrancy, and perspicuity - fairly basic discussion
4) Lesson 4 - knowability of God - internal and external witnesses to God (longish Torrence quote here on how the evidence of God differs from other objects of knowledge)
5) Lessons 5-7 - Trinitarian topics
6) Lesson 8 - attributes of God
7) Lesson 9 - Divine Decrees
8) Lesson 10 - Creation and Providence
9) Lesson 11 - Anthropology and Covenants

Systematic Theology II:

- These are all doctrine of the church

Systematic Theology III:

- Christology, Soteriology, Eschatology

Looks like Systematic I, Lessons 1-4 are maybe what you're after.

Let me know if I can provide additional info.

That's good for starters. Thanks.

 

[Polanus1561]

@RamistThomist I never gotten around reading Kelly due to the many ST's around... how is he? Any niches?

 

[RamistThomist]

@RamistThomist I never gotten around reading Kelly due to the many ST's around... how is he? Any niches?

It's on my Christmas list.

 

[Taylor]

@RamistThomist I never gotten around reading Kelly due to the many ST's around... how is he? Any niches?

Although I love Kelly’s work and highly respect him, I wasn’t overly pleased with his recent systematic theology. It uses the trinitarian organization, which I don’t find to be ideal. I also felt as though some significant discussions were missing (e.g., anthropology). To be fair, I have not read it but only consulted it.