How many "Tats" and why?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are the people to give up defacing their bodies for God while the missionary doesn't have to? That's a double standard. Or would the missionary not preach the whole counsel of God or try to 'redeem' tattoos?

Trent,

I thought your intent was quite clear here, but for clarification could you expound on this statement?

What message would a tattooed missionary send to a pagan tattooing tribe? How would he talk about Leviticus while trying to explain away his own tattoo?
I am no Pharisee, stop pulling that card lest you break number 9.
 
I think both, while not intrinsically sinful because booze and tobacco are sinful

I'm not following here... It's not sinful but it is at the same time?

I would never counsel someone it was good or adiaphora to drink a lot or smoke cigarettes every day, and by analogy I wouldn't recommend tattoos either.

I wouldn't counsel someone to drink a lot or smoke everyday either. I'm not sure how the terminology you used applies to tattoos. Everyday? A lot?

I think it's easy to make something up because someone doesn't like tattoos or they might be "taboo" or whatever. I think it's hard for someone to use the Law lawfully.
 
I think both, while not intrinsically sinful because booze and tobacco are sinful

I'm not following here... It's not sinful but it is at the same time?

I would never counsel someone it was good or adiaphora to drink a lot or smoke cigarettes every day, and by analogy I wouldn't recommend tattoos either.

I wouldn't counsel someone to drink a lot or smoke everyday either. I'm not sure how the terminology you used applies to tattoos. Everyday? A lot?

I think it's easy to make something up because someone doesn't like tattoos or they might be "taboo" or whatever. I think it's hard for someone to use the Law lawfully.

I meant, alcohol and tobacco use of all kinds/types/times is not sinful in and of itself.
Part of the problem is that I think it's difficult to treat tattoos in the same way one could responsibly treat alcohol, in that tattoos are these permanent, perpetually visible decisions.
 
Are the people to give up defacing their bodies for God while the missionary doesn't have to? That's a double standard. Or would the missionary not preach the whole counsel of God or try to 'redeem' tattoos?

Trent,

I thought your intent was quite clear here, but for clarification could you expound on this statement?

What message would a tattooed missionary send to a pagan tattooing tribe? How would he talk about Leviticus while trying to explain away his own tattoo?
I am no Pharisee, stop pulling that card lest you break number 9.

My best friend is a tattooed missionary to a pagan tribe. He has been very effective. I think he can communicate that his past was ungodly, yet God in his mercy can change your life and make you useful. And I think this also communicates to the pagan tribe that they, too, can be useful servants of God as well, despite their pasts.
 
I think the issue of tattooing is its permanent altering of the body. If tats and other body modification weren't permanent there would not be the sense that we are saying to the Lord, "my body is mine and I can do whatever I want with it".

This also brings up the ethical similarities/differences between tats/body modification and cosmetic surgery.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
Of course I know the difference between perfume and tattoos. But the argument "God did not create you that way" could be logically used against both, and two large Christian groups (Amsih , fundamentalists) have done so, so I think I am making a fair point. No need to be harsh.

Not intending to be harsh, just stating what I considered to be obvious. Rather than trying to structure the argument myself as to why this is true (since being Irenic is not one of my gifts), I'll incorporate by reference Mr. Tallach's comment of this morning:

I think the issue of tattooing is its permanent altering of the body. If tats and other body modification weren't permanent there would not be the sense that we are saying to the Lord, "my body is mine and I can do whatever I want with it".

This also brings up the ethical similarities/differences between tats/body modification and cosmetic surgery.
 
I think the issue of tattooing is its permanent altering of the body. If tats and other body modification weren't permanent there would not be the sense that we are saying to the Lord, "my body is mine and I can do whatever I want with it".

This also brings up the ethical similarities/differences between tats/body modification and cosmetic surgery.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2

Your assertions prove too much. Ear or nose piercing then would also seem to be condemned by your rationale, yet we see these things in the Old Testament among God's people.

For that matter then...now in these New Testament times, by your rationale condemning permanent things done to the body that cannot be reversed, circumcision might be condemned as immoral instead of being an indifferent choice. Studies continue to show only small and uncertain health benefits from this procedure,and some risks...and it is an irreversible procedure done to a patient not able to give consent to the cutting off of their own flesh (mainly for reasons of appearance). So, do you believe circumcision is sin, or not? And by what rationale?


About cosmetic surgery:

Cosmetic surgery seems permissible inasmuch as it is okay for any person to try to beautify themselves or improve deficient features. It would certainly be ungenerous to assume that the motivation behind all of these cosmetic surgeries was mere sinful vanity and shallowness. It is okay to try to make yourself look better.

I just read a book about advances in medicine which featured some advances in helping people to improve their appearance: (1) plastic surgeons repairing burn damage to skin, mainly in order to reduce scarification and make them look better, (2) urologists repairing deformities to the genitals so that the members looked normal and could function in marital relations and not cause overmuch embarrassment during their intimate moments with their spouses , (3) Others who are pioneering post-mastectomy breast implants (again, mainly for appearance rather than function), (4) others who are reducing large noses which are unsightly, and which were the cause of childhood teasing (only some of these over-large noses impaired breathing. (5) And others who are pioneering skin bleaching/coloration treatments for folks that have unevenly pigmented skin so that they don't look blotchy.

I believe a committed Christian could become a cosmetic surgeon to the glory of God and thank God for the ability to perform each of the above procedures. We are too quick to denounce cosmetic surgery and impute bad motives to those who desire beautification.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone -

I have a few - if I could go back in time I would not get them. I feel that they are prideful and vain and regret getting them to begin with. I would not judge someone for getting one but would strongly encourage someone (a brother or sister in particular) from getting any if they are on the cusp and thinking of getting one.
 
I think the issue of tattooing is its permanent altering of the body. If tats and other body modification weren't permanent there would not be the sense that we are saying to the Lord, "my body is mine and I can do whatever I want with it".

This also brings up the ethical similarities/differences between tats/body modification and cosmetic surgery.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2

Your assertions prove too much. Ear or nose piercing then would also seem to be condemned by your rationale, yet we see these things in the Old Testament among God's people.

For that matter then...now in these New Testament times, by your rationale condemning permanent things done to the body that cannot be reversed, circumcision might be condemned as immoral instead of being an indifferent choice. Studies continue to show only small and uncertain health benefits from this procedure,and some risks...and it is an irreversible procedure done to a patient not able to give consent to the cutting off of their own flesh (mainly for reasons of appearance). So, do you believe circumcision is sin, or not? And by what rationale?


About cosmetic surgery:

Cosmetic surgery seems permissible inasmuch as it is okay for any person to try to beautify themselves or improve deficient features. It would certainly be ungenerous to assume that the motivation behind all of these cosmetic surgeries was mere sinful vanity and shallowness. It is okay to try to make yourself look better.

I just read a book about advances in medicine which featured some advances in helping people to improve their appearance: (1) plastic surgeons repairing burn damage to skin, mainly in order to reduce scarification and make them look better, (2) urologists repairing deformities to the genitals so that the members looked normal and could function in marital relations and not cause overmuch embarrassment during their intimate moments with their spouses , (3) Others who are pioneering post-mastectomy breast implants (again, mainly for appearance rather than function), (4) others who are reducing large noses which are unsightly, and which were the cause of childhood teasing (only some of these over-large noses impaired breathing. (5) And others who are pioneering skin bleaching/coloration treatments for folks that have unevenly pigmented skin so that they don't look blotchy.

I believe a committed Christian could become a cosmetic surgeon to the glory of God and thank God for the ability to perform each of the above procedures. We are too quick to denounce cosmetic surgery and impute bad motives to those who desire beautification.

Sounds good, Pergy.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
How much do tattoos cost?

Depends on where you get them (probably in more ways than one). I think it used to be a couple of packs of cigarettes in prison, but with smoking now being banned in most of them, it may take less.
 
As a cosmetic and (if done correctly) permanent cosmetic process, are braces on the teeth subject to a similar criticism?
 
Myself included we've strayed from the point of the OP. "How Many "Tats" and why?".....not "are they sinful or not". Meaning I should have kept my mouth closed on this thread because I don't have any. :D
 
Sarah,

Since I started the thread, the discussion has been interesting to watch. You are correct that my intent was not to spark a debate over sin. Because I'm afraid of needles, the whole thing creeps me out pretty strongly. But, since so many people I know (and respect) have festooned their bodies with ink art, it was a genuine curiosity to me why people get the things.

In my life span, SEVERAL things have changed vis a vis societal attitudes. It does not seem so long ago when a woman with a tat on her lower back was denominated as having a "tramp stamp." Now both men and women seem to have them on full display (arms, necks, legs, etc.). When you run into major tats greeting you in conservative churches, you begin to realize that this is a social phenom that has much greater popularity in the culture than some of us old guys realized.

My original post sought to understand what people who get them are trying to say. Is it about personal expression? Rebellion? Identification with some niche in the broader culture? Individuation and artistic expression?
 
My original post sought to understand what people who get them are trying to say. Is it about personal expression? Rebellion? Identification with some niche in the broader culture? Individuation and artistic expression?

All of the above, depending on the individual, and then some.
 
It may be a tired argument but following the same logic I should not dye, or style, my hair; or wear jewelry or decorative type clothing. This is where the Amish have landed.

Well there's a bit of a step from avoiding these things and the Amish. Is doing these things a necessity? Such adornments were avoided by Christians in previous generations as they were signs of worldliness.
 
As a cosmetic and (if done correctly) permanent cosmetic process, are braces on the teeth subject to a similar criticism?

That's rectifying a fault/imperfection towards the ideal that God has given us, not scrawling experimentally on the image and likenesd that God has made us, as if we knew better than Him.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2
 
It may be a tired argument but following the same logic I should not dye, or style, my hair; or wear jewelry or decorative type clothing. This is where the Amish have landed.

Well there's a bit of a step from avoiding these things and the Amish. Is doing these things a necessity? Such adornments were avoided by Christians in previous generations as they were signs of worldliness.

Is electricity (or automobiles) necessities?
 
As a cosmetic and (if done correctly) permanent cosmetic process, are braces on the teeth subject to a similar criticism?

That's rectifying a fault/imperfection towards the ideal that God has given us, not scrawling experimentally on the image and likenesd that God has made us, as if we knew better than Him.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2

Richard,

Your statement, "scrawling experimentally on the image and likeness that God has made us, as if we knew better than Him" is a phrase full of subjective and emotionally-laden terms.

First, it appears that you distinguish between permissible actions that rectify a deficiency and impermissible markings (such as tats). Does this mean that one can only rectify a glaring fault rather than trying to beautify a body/face, etc that has no marked deficiencies or deformities but can still be improved upon by effort (i.e. we can correct the inadequate but cannot beautify the adequate)? Where is your Scriptural warrant for this?

Do you believe that nose-rings, ear-rings, hair dye are permissible? Would a nose-job then be permissible? Breast-augmentation for the married couple who has adequate financial means? Braids in the hair? Nail polish?

About your phrase, "as if we knew better than him..." - Are you okay then with skin bleaching to improve the consistency of skin tone for those with varied splotches of skin (unequal melanin distribution)? God gave them this skin, didn't he? How about surgeries for erasing birth-marks or other skin marks present from birth?

Do you have any sort of general guidance that can be applied across the board so as to judge what is permissible and what is not?
 
How much do tattoos cost?

Depends on where you get them (probably in more ways than one). I think it used to be a couple of packs of cigarettes in prison, but with smoking now being banned in most of them, it may take less.

We are having a lot of riots in our prisons over that decision.
(I do feel some compassion for the smoking prisoners)
 
As a cosmetic and (if done correctly) permanent cosmetic process, are braces on the teeth subject to a similar criticism?

That's rectifying a fault/imperfection towards the ideal that God has given us, not scrawling experimentally on the image and likenesd that God has made us, as if we knew better than Him.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2

Richard,

Your statement, "scrawling experimentally on the image and likeness that God has made us, as if we knew better than Him" is a phrase full of subjective and emotionally-laden terms.

First, it appears that you distinguish between permissible actions that rectify a deficiency and impermissible markings (such as tats). Does this mean that one can only rectify a glaring fault rather than trying to beautify a body/face, etc that has no marked deficiencies or deformities but can still be improved upon by effort (i.e. we can correct the inadequate but cannot beautify the adequate)? Where is your Scriptural warrant for this?

Do you believe that nose-rings, ear-rings, hair dye are permissible? Would a nose-job then be permissible? Breast-augmentation for the married couple who has adequate financial means? Braids in the hair? Nail polish?

About your phrase, "as if we knew better than him..." - Are you okay then with skin bleaching to improve the consistency of skin tone for those with varied splotches of skin (unequal melanin distribution)? God gave them this skin, didn't he? How about surgeries for erasing birth-marks or other skin marks present from birth?

Do you have any sort of general guidance that can be applied across the board so as to judge what is permissible and what is not?

There's a big difference between seeking to remove genetic imperfections - e.g. birthmarks - towards the way God made us, which genetic imperfections have come in since the Fall, and, in our own fallen wisdom, adding our own markings to the body, which body is not ours. When Man was created he wasn't covered in pictures and writing and we have been given no authority to do this to ourselves or others in disrespect of God's image and likeness.

But as I said a discreet tat is a lot better than scrawling all over the body, and there are other abuses of the body than tats which may be more heinous, including allowing yourself get overweight.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elaine_Davidson

Peace, brother Pergy, I'm bowing out of the debate.
 
It may be a tired argument but following the same logic I should not dye, or style, my hair; or wear jewelry or decorative type clothing. This is where the Amish have landed.

Well there's a bit of a step from avoiding these things and the Amish. Is doing these things a necessity? Such adornments were avoided by Christians in previous generations as they were signs of worldliness.

Is electricity (or automobiles) necessities?

Well, actually, a case could be made that electricity is a necessity today. However, since you're clearly being sarcastic, I would just say that electricity and automobiles are indifferent things; make-up, tattoos, ostentatious clothing are not.
 
As a cosmetic and (if done correctly) permanent cosmetic process, are braces on the teeth subject to a similar criticism?

That's rectifying a fault/imperfection towards the ideal that God has given us, not scrawling experimentally on the image and likenesd that God has made us, as if we knew better than Him.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk 2

Richard,

Your statement, "scrawling experimentally on the image and likeness that God has made us, as if we knew better than Him" is a phrase full of subjective and emotionally-laden terms.

First, it appears that you distinguish between permissible actions that rectify a deficiency and impermissible markings (such as tats). Does this mean that one can only rectify a glaring fault rather than trying to beautify a body/face, etc that has no marked deficiencies or deformities but can still be improved upon by effort (i.e. we can correct the inadequate but cannot beautify the adequate)? Where is your Scriptural warrant for this?

Do you believe that nose-rings, ear-rings, hair dye are permissible? Would a nose-job then be permissible? Breast-augmentation for the married couple who has adequate financial means? Braids in the hair? Nail polish?

About your phrase, "as if we knew better than him..." - Are you okay then with skin bleaching to improve the consistency of skin tone for those with varied splotches of skin (unequal melanin distribution)? God gave them this skin, didn't he? How about surgeries for erasing birth-marks or other skin marks present from birth?

Do you have any sort of general guidance that can be applied across the board so as to judge what is permissible and what is not?

Your whole post is filled with a legalistic spirit. Hard cases make bad laws. There will always be situations which require thought and discernment. However, to use such cases to argue for such wide liberty, indeed licentiousness, is wrong. I think anyone who approached this subject in a reasoned, unbiased way would easily understand the difference in principle between cosmetic surgery used in response to, for example, an accident which led to the body being marred or deformed; and cosmetic surgery used because the person just doesn't like the way they look, or want to make themselves "prettier". The former is a legitimate use of medical expertise, which after all is itself God given; the latter an illegitimate use as it's nothing but pride. You mentioned "nose jobs"- some of these are actually to the benefit of the person's health, are they not? Improving the breathing.

Some people want a list of rules and dos and don'ts. Sometimes we need to just try to apply principles to every situation.

An earlier commenter mentioned that in different cultures there are different standards of modesty. I'm not sure if he was saying that he, himself, believed modesty was relativistic. What I would say is that maybe some cultures are just immodest. Covering oneself is a feature found across the world. It's not only the Victorians who thought that was necessary to be modest. I think Scripture lays down some pretty clear principles in this area. When Adam and Eve fell, they knew they were naked and covered themselves. With the loss of our original innocence, nakedness becomes something to be covered. That was the sin of Ham: uncovering the nakedness of his father. Paul counsels against ostentatious, gaudy clothing and adornments, because they were the adornments of the pagan and immoral. And not just of his own time. Just as in every culture the showing of flesh is a sign of paganism and immorality, so is gaudy clothing. From 1st Century Judea to 21st century Britain.

All of this is to say that whenever Scripture refers to artificial, or man initiated, adornments of the body it's not positive. The adornments for the Christian are spiritual, not carnal. Yes OT women wore piercings; OT men had multiple wives. It's not as simple as that. The only place where Scripture speaks about tattoos it is condemned. So even if that verse in Leviticus is not applicable here, that verse taken with other verses which talk about how we dress ourselves, gives a very strong indication that tattoos are not permissible. when all the evidence points against something, one surely needs a cast iron justification to say that it's actually permissible. Where is this justification?

And as to smoking: many today would say that to smoke is to violate the sixth commandment as we know full well the dangers and effects of smoking.
 
Ezekial 16:

“‘I bathed you with water and washed the blood from you and put ointments on you. 10 I clothed you with an embroidered dress and put sandals of fine leather on you. I dressed you in fine linen and covered you with costly garments. 11 I adorned you with jewelry: I put bracelets on your arms and a necklace around your neck, 12 and I put a ring on your nose, earrings on your ears and a beautiful crown on your head. 13 So you were adorned with gold and silver; your clothes were of fine linen and costly fabric and embroidered cloth. Your food was honey, olive oil and the finest flour. You became very beautiful and rose to be a queen. 14 And your fame spread among the nations on account of your beauty, because the splendor I had given you made your beauty perfect, declares the Sovereign Lord.

Did God make Israel gaudy and ostentatiously sinful by His beautification efforts towards her (which were not merely to correct previous deficiencies)?


I believe that Scripture does not equate all attempts at beautification with sinful pride. There are principles of modesty and warnings against pride, yet it seems that these warnings do not prohibit all attempts at beautification. There is no command to be as frumpy as possible.

Thus my position is: Beautification does not necessarily equal pride. Thus cosmetic surgery is often a permissible realm of Christian liberty.

If one has the technology to easily fix an ugly nose and this expenditure is not great, the person seems to be at liberty to fix their ugly nose and not be condemned by the Church. Likewise, fixing one's hair and skin, even via medical means, seems to be worthwhile endeavors (especially if you are married to a spouse that is not blind or ascetic). If botox works well and removes wrinkles...well, praise God for these medical advancements.

I am sure some of you have gotten your teeth whitened, after all. To be indifferent and careless as to your appearance does not equate necessarily to greater godliness.
 
Last edited:
No tats. My reasons are are subjective and not moral. I find them completely unattractive but not morally objectionable other than as a financial drain for some folks that cannot really afford them. They are ubiquitous now, almost like earrings used to be on women. I am dismissive of them when people ask about them. They get no suburbanite-turn-underground-indy-edginess credit from me as that is so 1993. In a similar vein, one of my employees has the whole ear plug, spacer thing going. He, 21 years old, kind of regrets it now but is past the point of no return save a surgical operation. Just yesterday we had a conversation about it. One earlobe is infected, bleeding and he was complaining about the pain. My grandma has advance Parkinson's, my grandpa just broke his leg and my mother is recovering from lung clots. I really don't care about this kid's stupid pain. People don't think. How many times can you change your girlfriends/wives name on your sagging middle aged pecs? Not to mention other areas. I'm probably the most antiwar guy here, not gung-ho or a military guy at all but I can conjure some respect for having one's corp, division, platoon, ship or whatever tattooed on your arm as member of a group that is likely to incur real scars when the bullets are flying. A wounded amputee, drafted into a war with a flag tatooed has my respect and sympathy but not his unemployed grandson spending 1000s on "body art". Oh by the way, a sunrise over your buttcrack is beautiful and meaningful how?
 
Time Out For Some Refreshment

Just a reminder of who we all are, with or without tattoos.

From Pulpit Prayers, Alexander Maclaren, circa 1911, prayer # 156

O Lord! truly we have nothing to pay, and frankly, Thou forgivest us all. May the sense of our infinite obligations to Thee for Thine infinite mercy to us open up fountains of joyful surrender in our hearts which will follow out always in all holy living, and in grateful yielding of ourselves to that great Saviour.

Deliver us, we pray Thee, from the error of ever making light of the sins which Thy pardoning mercy takes away. May we all, feel, what indeed is true, that we all have been forgiven very much. And may our love ever bear some proportion to our obligation and our lives be ordered by our love.

We thank Thee, O Lord, that however the past has been stained and imperfect, they who come to Thee with penitent tears and with thankful love cease to be sinners, whatever men may think. We thank Thee that Thou, Who knowest us better than any of us know one another, hast infinite mercy, and that Thou canst read all hearts. Read ours, we beseech Thee, and teach us to read them. May we have no pharisaical abhorrence of sinful men and women, no pharisaical confidence in our own deeds, but we be glad to take our place beside the publicans of the world, and be content to depend, as they do, upon Thy mercy, unmerited and free, all sufficient and entire.

But we pray Thee, O Lord, that Thou wouldst help us day by day to 'perfect holiness in the fear of the Lord' ; and just because Thou hast lifted us from the horrible pit and the miry clay may we feel that our feet are set upon a rock. And may our goings be established, and we live day by day cultivating and making our own more and more of the excellences and the graces of which Jesus Christ is the Example, and of which, blessed be God ! Jesus Christ is the source for us.

We thank Thee that in union with Him we become other than we are. We thank Thee for that new life created after the image of Thyself, which is imparted to all them that humbly cherish the faith in Jesus Christ. And we pray that we may experience, and feel that we growingly experience, not only Thy forgiving mercy but Thy sanctifying and elevating and ennobling grace. May we be growing, and to our own perception growing, more and more in the likeness of our Lord and Saviour.

Thou hast appointed that the nearer we come to Thee, the further off we feel we are. Thou hast made it the case that the more we grow towards God, the more we are sensible of the distance between us. But we thank Thee for that gracious knowledge of infirmity, of imperfection, which ever accompanies the advance in the Divine life. And we beseech Thee that the higher we rise toward Thee, the lowlier we may lie in our own estimation, as recognising how far it is from the highest mountain-tops to the Heavens, and from the most perfect man to God. But help us, we pray Thee, not only to be buoyed up, and borne onwards by, and uprising continually to calm assurance that we shall be like Him when we see Him as He is.

We thank Thee for the great hope, we thank Thee for the encouragement which comes to all toilers and wrestlers here below. We thank Thee that none of us needs to give up, or to let the feeble hands hang down, and the knees give way and cease to advance on the road to God. We pray that we may be helped and heartened day by day to take up our cross and our burden to-day, to do the day's work with the day's strength, and look as those who trust in Thee may look without presumption, that in all good things possessed, and in all good things done and realised in our souls, 'to-morrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant.'

Help us thus, we pray Thee, to grow in grace and the knowledge of our Saviour. May our lives be peaceful and happy lives because we are coming ever nearer to our love, ever closer to our Redeemer, ever liker to Him in his perfection.

We beseech Thee to give us Thy blessing in this evening's worship. May it be indeed to meet with Thee that we come. Oh ! do Thou help us to pass beyond all external aids, even by the help of these aids, to come into the secret place of the Most High, that we may each have touch with God, and each feel that it is Thee Who by these outward ordinances art speaking to our hearts. Lead us we pray Thee, in our hour of service into the holy places where we shall find our Master, and lose our sins. And if we have brought with us burdens or sorrows, tasks or duties, cares or troubles, strengthen us by waiting upon Thee to bear and to do all Thy holy will, and may we do it as from the heart, and so do it well.

In all the variety of circumstances and character, guide us along the paths of life so that we may glorify Thy Holy Name. It is for Thee to appoint whether the road be rough or smooth, crooked or straight. We dare not seem to prescribe to Thee. Thou maintainest our lot. May our hears say Thou shalt choose our inheritance for us, but help us, wherever Thou dost lead us, and whatever Thou dost lay upon us, giving us grace according to our need, strength that shall perfect itself in our weakness, and the daily bread and succour for the daily hunger and necessity.

Take us into Thy care now, O Lord, forgive or many sine, and grant us Thy gracious presence and blessing in this hour of worship, for the sake Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour.
 
A tattoo can cost anywhere from $50 to $500. My wife got one which cost her about $200. I won't get any.. Just in case I am in a situation where I would regret it. I also don't have anything that is that pressing that I feel like I need to put on my body.. If I put my wife's name and she died tomorrow I would be married to another woman for 50 years of life with a different woman's name on my body. Anything scriptural I think I should just memorize.. It's a good conversation starter to talk about the gospel but there are other ways to do that.. Fully agree that if you apply the Leviticus verse you essentially have to apply all the other parts from the verses that come after.. And I am not against them. I just don't prefer them
 
That is why you make sure you get a REAL meaningful phrase as your tattoo...an inspirational life-motto, like "No Ragrets" or "Nolege is power!"

no-ragrets-temporary-tattoo.jpg

XcjaZmJ.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top