Sabbath Institution?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ReformedRift

Puritan Board Freshman
Hello brothers,

We had a visitor at our church who comes from a seventh day adventist background and was asking about why the Sabbath is observed on the first day of the week following the resurrection of Christ. In addition to Murray's chapter "Sabbath Institution" and the OPC's report on Sabbath Matters, could anyone point me to materials for further study? Thanks~
 
Richard Barcellos - Getting the Garden Right: Adams Work and God’s Rest in Light of Christ will be very helpful.

A free resource, that can be acquired from Chapel Library in Florida (you get one free mailed item per month, I believe, upon request) is Sam Waldron - The Lord’s Day: It’s Presuppositions, Proofs, Precedents, and Practice. This too, was helpful for me.
 
Thanks everyone, there's a Korean cult that goes around my college talking about how Christianity is corrupt because we "don't follow" God's command to rest on the seventh day.
 
This is an axample where Christian practice has undermined sound doctrine. If more Christians properly observed the Lord's day, fewer people would be vulnerable to specious arguments.
 
Thanks everyone, there's a Korean cult that goes around my college talking about how Christianity is corrupt because we "don't follow" God's command to rest on the seventh day.
Wouldn't happen to be WMSCOG would it? We have one directly next door to us. Fairly aggressive and advocating for observing OT feast days in addition to Saturday Sabbath.
 
Thanks everyone, there's a Korean cult that goes around my college talking about how Christianity is corrupt because we "don't follow" God's command to rest on the seventh day.

And this is a good reminder of one of the problems of Korean Christianity. I'm painfully aware of the role of Korean cults that not only claim to be Christian, but in some cases even identify as Presbyterian.

We're going to be seeing this with China as well once the persecution ends and the government decides Christianity isn't the enemy. The underground "house church" movement in China is a very, very mixed bag.

Many American Christians love to romanticize persecution, but we forget that our actual history shows us that when access to sound teaching is limited, the Scriptures are burned, and legitimate ecclesiastical authorities have little or no ability to debate and debunk false doctrine, sincere but confused believers become prey to wolves and shepherds too often aren't around to protect them. All sorts of heretical movements existed in the ancient church alongside true Christianity. In the Middle Ages, various Cathari dualistic heresies existed alongside the Waldensians and other legitimate opponents of the Roman Catholic Church. I'm not one of the people who say all Anabaptists were damnable heretics, but it IS true that the Reformation in Germany and England was plagued with numerous aberrant movements which attracted followers because they presented themselves as being more throughgoing in their removal of Catholic error than the Reformers, and in the process, attacked a number of things on which the Lutherans, the Reformed, and the Anglicans all agreed the Catholics were right.

The core of the problem in Korea is that not too many years after a massive Korean revival known as the Korean Pentecost happened and the government started paying attention to the large and growing number of Christians in Korea, the occupying Japanese forced the Korean Presbyterian General Assembly -- literally at gunpoint, with armed Japanese soldiers ringing the assembly hall -- to adopt a statement that Japanese Shinto ceremonies worshipping the emperor were a legitimate patriotic observance. As usually happens, most of the denominational leaders decided to collaborate, with some heroic exceptions, and back in the United States, the Northern Presbyterian General Assembly actually decided that Shinto worship was comparable to pledging allegiance to the American flag.

To his credit, J. Gresham Machen was very upset, and many years later after the OPC was formed, a single OPC missionary to the Koreans, Rev. Bruce F. Hunt, became known for refusing to cooperate with emperor worship and was arrested. During a traditional Korean ritualized "walk of shame" in which the whole village is called out to witness a criminal being taken from the jail to the courthouse, and in which the villagers usually mock and berate the criminal, the Koreans started calling out "To the end! To the end!" meaning, "Stay faithful to the end!" The Japanese-controlled government recognized that antagonizing Americans in the era of "gunboat diplomacy," and at the same time potentially setting off a Korean rebellion, were both REALLY bad ideas and released Rev. Hunt to defuse the chaos. Any idea why conservative Koreans, after the Japanese were kicked out, wondered if the OPC was the last faithful Presbyterian body left? What became the Presbytery of Pusan, and later the Kosin Presbyterian denomination, called on the OPC for help. Look at that again. A group of Koreans that already was multiple orders of magnitude larger than the OPC said, "You were faithful under persecution, nobody else helped us, come back and help us now."

My objections to the OPC are well known and a matter of public record; there are reasons I amicably transferred out of my former church when it joined the OPC. I don't belong in the OPC and I know it. What you will never hear from me is criticism of the founders of the OPC, and most of the modern people in the OPC, for standing up for the truth under persecution. These were professors at PRINCETON SEMINARY -- the elite of the elite -- who gave up basically everything to start Westminster Seminary, and less than a decade later, gave up most of what little they had left to start the OPC. Rev. Hunt's faithfulness under fire SHOULD have been expected, not just of conservative Presbyterians but of any evangelical Bible-believing Christian. The fact is that he stood alone. And the high regard that Koreans have for the OPC is due almost entirely to one man who said, "I am not going to compromise and disobey God's Word."

Remember that, by the way, the next time you or your church faces far less serious problems from American liberals and leftists who can't do anything close to what the Japanese occupiers could do to Rev. Hunt. Way too many American Christians bow the knee to wokeism and compromise with wickedness merely to avoid being uncomfortable or to avoid people saying bad things about us or calling us "intolerant."

The problem is that the Koreans who loved and remembered Bruce Hunt weren't the only ones who were estranged from the Japanese collaborators in the Korean Presbyterian General Assembly. For decades, no Korean students could get seminary training without collaborating with the Japanese, which led to large numbers of pastors who were minimally trained and illicitly ordained serving churches that were either fully underground or claimed to be part of the official church while taking advantage of their rural isolated locations to ignore it as much as possible.

It's pretty obvious that maintaining any sort of functional presbyterian system of church courts under such conditions won't work and can't work. All sorts of ministers and elders, both good and not so good, many with good intent but minimal training, were gathering people around themselves with no effective way to keep false doctrine out. In fact, if the official Japanese-controlled Korean Presbyterian ecclesiastical authorities tried to ban a preacher, it was often viewed as a good sign of his faithfulness in refusing to bow the knee to Shinto shrine worship, and more people started coming to his underground church than were coming before the official church authorities criticized him.

The result was all sorts of new denominations in Korea after the end of World War II, and even more after the disruptions of the Korean War in which many preachers from what is now North Korea fled to the South, and gathered new congregations with no way to verify their claims about what they said they had been doing before 1950 in the northern provinces of Korea.

Among the pastors who fled the north was Sun Myung Moon, founder of the Unification Church, which is the best-known in the West of those Korean cults. Sadly, there are many other Korean cult groups, including one which bought a former Assemblies of God college in Missouri and is promulgating its views and claiming to be Presbyterian. Any real Presbyterian, even in denominations like the ECO or EPC, will recognize that group's aberrant teachings on what they will call free grace (it's basically an extreme version of what John MacArthur was fighting against during the Lordship Controversy, and utterly foreign to a Reformed view of total depravity). But they have a ton of money because Korean churches typically mandate tithing and Korean immigrants to the United States often are very successful in business, and they are causing a lot of problems.

Remember that when you read stories about the current liberal South Korean government harassing Korean church groups. The story is more complicated than it appears. Yes, there are situations in which the current Korean government is targeting political opponents in churches and Charlie Kirk and others were right to raise warning flags. But in a number of cases, the churches being targeted -- even if they seem to have "normal" names and identify as Presbyterian -- are cult groups, have doctrinal problems, or their leaders are legitimately accused of financial improprieties. We're not used to a situation in the United States in which conservative Reformed churches with a thousand adult members are considered to be medium-sized or even small. Influential Korean Presbyterian churches are far, far, far larger than all but the very largest conservative American Presbyterian churches -- think First Columbia, Coral Ridge under D. James Kennedy, Tenth Philadelphia during its heyday, etc. -- and that comes with VERY large budgets, and lots of money can lead to financial problems that just don't happen in small churches because everybody knows everybody.

I am deeply enamored of Korean Christianity. But I know its problems, and the explosion of heretical and outright cult groups traces directly to the experience under persecution when getting in trouble with the ecclesiastical authorities was often a mark of faithfulness in the minds of simple believers, which made them prey for wolves.


This is an axample where Christian practice has undermined sound doctrine. If more Christians properly observed the Lord's day, fewer people would be vulnerable to specious arguments.

I agree with others on this thread such as @TheBoringBaptist -- a thousand times AMEN!

Teaching a Reformed view of the Lords Day prevents a ton of problems from the SDA and related groups.
 
Last edited:
We had a visitor at our church who comes from a seventh day adventist background and was asking about why the Sabbath is observed on the first day of the week following the resurrection of Christ. In addition to Murray's chapter "Sabbath Institution" and the OPC's report on Sabbath Matters, could anyone point me to materials for further study? Thanks~

1. Beyond the Cycle of Seven​

In the biblical creation narrative, God rests on the seventh day. By rising from the dead on the day after the Sabbath, Jesus effectively broke the 7-day loop of the old world.
  • The 7th Day: Represents the finish line of the "Old Creation" and the rest from labor.
  • The 8th Day: Represents the starting line of the "New Creation." It is the first day of a new week that never ends.

2. Biblical & Symbolic Roots​

The number eight has always carried the theme of "rescue" and "new starts" in Judeo-Christian tradition:
  • The Ark: Eight people were saved from the Flood (2 Peter 2:5) to repopulate the earth.

  • Circumcision: Performed on the eighth day, marking a child’s entry into the covenant.
  • The Resurrection: All four Gospels emphasize that Jesus rose on "the first day of the week," which the early Church Fathers (like Justin Martyr and Ignatius) quickly coined "The Eighth Day."

3. Theological Significance: "Already, But Not Yet"​

Viewing Sunday as the Eighth Day changes the "vibe" of the day from mere rules to cosmic celebration:
  • Eternity in Time: It is seen as a "portal" where the eternal world breaks into our 24-hour world.
  • The Lord’s Day: It’s not just a replacement for the Saturday Sabbath; it’s an upgrade. If the 7th day is about rest, the 8th day is about recreation (as in, being made new)

4. Architectural Legacy​

You can see this theology in history through Baptisteries. Many ancient Christian baptismal fonts and buildings (like the Lateran Baptistery in Rome) are octagonal (eight-sided).
  • The Logic: Through baptism, a person dies to the old world (the 7 days) and is born into the new life of Christ (the 8th day).
  • "The day of the Resurrection: the first day of the week, it remains the first day; but it is called the eighth day, because it points to the life of the world to come." — Basil the Great
[automerge]1774327390[/automerge]
Some quotes:

To the early Church Fathers, the "Eighth Day" wasn't just a calendar quirk; it was a way to explain how Jesus had fundamentally "reset" time itself.
Here are four specific quotes from the first few centuries that capture this shift from the 7th-day rest to the 8th-day new creation.
1. The Epistle of Barnabas (c. 74 AD)
One of the earliest Christian writings outside the New Testament, this letter explicitly connects the "Eighth Day" to the Resurrection and the "beginning of another world."
> "I will make a beginning of the eighth day, that is, a beginning of another world. Wherefore, also, we keep the eighth day with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead."
> — Epistle of Barnabas, 15:8–9
>
2. St. Justin Martyr (c. 155 AD)
Writing to the Roman Emperor and later debating a Jewish interlocutor (Trypho), Justin explains why Sunday is the primary day of worship, linking it to both the first day of creation and the day of the resurrection.
> "The command of circumcision, again, bidding them always circumcise the children on the eighth day, was a type of the true circumcision, by which we are circumcised from deceit and iniquity through Him who rose from the dead on the first day after the Sabbath... For the first day after the Sabbath, remaining the first of all the days, is called, however, the eighth."
> — Dialogue with Trypho, 41
>
3. St. Basil the Great (c. 330–379 AD)
Basil provides a more mystical, "timeless" view. He argues that the Eighth Day is a symbol of eternity because it exists "outside" the normal 7-day cycle.
> "The day of the Resurrection: the first day of the week, it remains the first day; but it is called the eighth day, because it points to the life of the world to come... it is the day without evening, the day that knows no succession, the age that does not grow old."
> — On the Holy Spirit, 27
>
4. St. Augustine of Hippo (c. 354–430 AD)
Augustine famously divided human history into "Seven Ages." In his view, we are currently in the sixth or seventh age, but the final goal is the Eighth Day.
> "The seventh shall be our Sabbath, which shall be brought to a close, not by an evening, but by the Lord's day, as an eighth and eternal day, consecrated by the resurrection of Christ... There we shall rest and see, see and love, love and praise. This is what shall be in the end without end."
> — The City of God, 22.30
>
Key Takeaway for Your "Thumbnail"
In these quotes, you can see a consistent pattern:
* The 7th Day (Sabbath) is the end of the old world.
* The 8th Day (Sunday) is the birth of the new world.
* The Goal is to move from a "rest from work" to a "participation in eternal life."
 
Wow @darrellmaurina thanks for all that information. Where did you learn all this? Any book recommendations?

That's actually a great question.

As for how I learned what I did, a great deal is "caught," not "taught."

My wife is Korean, we met when we were students at Calvin back in the 1980s, and she translated over fifty books, mostly though not entirely Reformed and Puritan theology and history, from English into Korean when she worked as a professional translator for a major Korean Christian publishing company. (She's been out of translation work for decades, went on to get her own doctoral degree in clinical psychology, and retired last year from private practice after many years working almost entirely with military wives and children here at Fort Leonard Wood, the home of the US Army's Engineer, Military Police and Chemical schools.)

As for me, while working as a reporter for a decade at Christian Renewal covering the CRC secession, I was directly involved in the secession of nearly all of the CRC's large Korean churches, and 40 percent of the total membership, due to liberalism. I'm the one who Dr. John E. Kim, who had been for years the pastor of what became the CRC's second largest church and later was president of Chongshin University and Seminary in Seoul, credited for waking him up to just how bad things had gotten in the CRC. Many others, some of whom were much closer to Dr. Kim than me (Rev. Tom and Laurie Vanden Heuvel, for example, who had gone to seminary with Dr. Kim and had been friends since seminary days) tried to warn him and had some success, but it was my reporting on the controversy over the CRC's first openly gay minister, Rev. Jim Lucas, that caused him to realize how bad things really had gotten. Reading my articles on what was happening with homosexuality at Calvin College and Classis Grand Rapids East and seeing what denominational leaders were saying and doing caused him to say, "We're done with this, we're out of here." (For what it's worth, Dr. Kim is the man who married me and my wife.)

I do not want to exaggerate my ties to the Korean church world -- it's pretty difficult to maintain close ties to the Korean church world when living for the last two decades in the rural Ozarks -- but a great deal of what I know is simply from dealing for decades with Koreans, all the way back to the 1980s, and being very impressed with Koreans before most "white guys" realized how big a deal the Korean church growth really was. I had access to article-length rather than book-length treatment of Korean church developments as the problems were actually going on, and in the case of the Korean CRC secession, I was the man who was writing those articles. My life probably would have been a lot different if I had listened to efforts by some of the elders in Dr. Kim's church to get me to move to California and work with the second-generation Korean young people whose faith was being destroyed by the liberalism and broad evangelicalism they were being taught in California public schools and universities, but I made different choices in my life, and for better or for worse, I'm living in the American Bible Belt where the Reformed faith is all but unknown and I expect I'll be here the rest of my life.

You asked about books.

I wish I could give some simple book recommendations, and have those recommendations in English. I feel somewhat like John Gerstner who told R.C. Sproul as a young student that the best way to learn Reformed theology was to learn Dutch and study in the Netherlands because (during that era) there was no doctoral-level program in the United States that could provide the level of theological education Sproul needed to deal with contemporary Reformed issues and popularize Reformed theology -- doctoral-level theological education in the United States, back then, was almost entirely at liberal universities and theological seminaries that had only a scattering (at best) of confessionally Reformed men, and mostly focused on Reformed church history, not dealing with modern theological and confessional issues. (By God's grace, that is ancient history and at least two generations now in the United States have had access to good doctoral-level programs in English at confessionally Reformed institutions. There are plenty of places where someone like R.C. Sproul, as a young man, could go today.)

There are very few resources book-length in English on the problems of the contemporary Korean church written from a Reformed perspective. However, I can certainly give books on the key parts of Korean church history and how persecution shaped the church from its earliest days.

The two standard ones are "The Korean Pentecost" written jointly by a father and son-in-law, William Blair and Bruce F. Hunt (mentioned above) who were among the early Presbyterian missionaries to Korea, and Esther Ahn's "If I Perish," written by a woman who was imprisoned for years and came one day away from dying for unfurling a banner in the Japanese parliament warning that Japan would be destroyed if it did not stop persecuting Korean Christians. (The dropping of the atomic bomb saved her life -- not knowing what orders they would get from Japan, the Koreans stopped executions the day before she would have been executed.)

Here are links:

The Korean Pentecost:

If I Perish

There are definitely other good books about Korean church growth, but I've always been an advocate of saying we need to read the primary sources instead of later writers who try to "explain what happened."

You might as well learn directly from Rev. Hunt and his father-in-law, and Esther Ahn herself, rather than learning from other people who may have had agendas different from the people who actually lived through the growth and persecution of Korean Presbyterianism.

I wish I could post a link to a series of lectures that Dr. John E. Kim himself gave at Calvin Seminary back in the 1990s about Korean church history. He was directly involved himself in many of the events -- he was converted during the Korean War, came to the United States and studied at Calvin Seminary, got a Th.M. from Westminster in Philadelphia and his doctoral degree from (I think) Temple University, went back to Korea and became academic dean of Chongshin, and then came to Los Angeles at the beginning of a major wave of Korean immigration and founded what was one of the two largest Korean churches in Los Angeles and the second-largest church in the CRC.

As far as I know Dr. Kim spoke extemporaneously with no prepared script (which says a great deal about how good his English was), and his lectures have never been published though I know they were taped. In writing this, I realize that I probably ought to contact people at Calvin Seminary to see if those tapes still exist. If they exist and haven't been transcribed, they need to be. Dr. Kim didn't say anything negative about the CRC -- you do not attack your host if you are Asian -- but Calvin Seminary either didn't realize what they had when he gave those lectures, or didn't want to promote Dr. Kim due to his role in the CRC secession. I don't want to assume the latter; it's entirely possible the faculty honestly did not know that he was teaching things that, as far as I know, do not exist anywhere in print in English.

Anyway, you've given me some ideas and I'll make some contacts at Calvin Seminary and see if those tapes still exist. If they exist, they need to be transcribed and published.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top