After beeing here for a short time, I must ask this question.
Is the topic of Theonomy, Reconstructionism, or whatever other labels it falls under only discussed in Presbyterian circles?
Coming from the PRC I must say we never even mentioned it. Is it denominational specific? I feel like the kid in gym class that just watched from the sidelines.
Why is it so important to have the same topic, discussed under 72 headings? Is it a complicated matter?
According to my teachings and understandings, The gospel does not equal disputed externals of Sabbath, tithe, church government, water administration, sacraments, worship, civil magistrate authority.
I am not implying that the topic is not worth discussing, I am just wondering why it is weighed so heavily in the 33 Presbyterian spin offs only?:bigsmile:
DMB
[Edited on 6-2-2005 by D Battjes]
Is the topic of Theonomy, Reconstructionism, or whatever other labels it falls under only discussed in Presbyterian circles?
Coming from the PRC I must say we never even mentioned it. Is it denominational specific? I feel like the kid in gym class that just watched from the sidelines.
Why is it so important to have the same topic, discussed under 72 headings? Is it a complicated matter?
According to my teachings and understandings, The gospel does not equal disputed externals of Sabbath, tithe, church government, water administration, sacraments, worship, civil magistrate authority.
I am not implying that the topic is not worth discussing, I am just wondering why it is weighed so heavily in the 33 Presbyterian spin offs only?:bigsmile:
DMB
[Edited on 6-2-2005 by D Battjes]