Ash Wednesday "opportunity"

Status
Not open for further replies.

therussellhome

Puritan Board Freshman
My pastor sent the following in the weekly newsletter. I ask for your prayers and advice as I consider how do I respond to my pastor and session. For background, this is a PCA church where I'm a member and where, in general, I find little that afflicts my conscience.

In general, our tradition is not a fan of the church calendar. You may not know this but there are some parts of the Reformed world that don't believe that we should celebrate Christmas or Easter because they think Paul's words in Galatians 4:10 speak against that. Obviously, here at UPC, we would disagree but the point is that many of us are either unfamiliar with or suspicious of "seasons" in the church. In some ways that means that we miss an opportunity presented to us on a day like today - Ash Wednesday.

Today marks the beginning of the season called Lent. It is a 40 day (not counting Sundays) period of preparation for the celebration of Easter. It is intended to be a period of repentance, of intentional reflection on our neediness, and a time to prepare our hearts for the joyous celebration of Easter. Unfortunately, for many of us, all we think about is arbitrary abstinence from unhealthy behaviors or guilty pleasures. I get it, I don't understand how "giving up" chocolate prepares you for Easter either but maybe we need to think about this differently.

The church calendar was devised for several purposes. The first was to annually tell the story of redemption. Seasons like Advent, Christmas, Epiphany, Lent, Easter, Pentecost, etc., told the story of redemption for the average church goer every year. This was especially important since most people at the time did not have access to a Bible. The second was as a way to regularly practice spiritual disciplines. Lent, in particular, is an annual time of fasting, something Jesus commends and seems to assume we do (Matt 6:16). The third reason was what some scholars call the redemption of time. This one is a little more abstract. The thought here is that if Jesus is the Lord and not Caesar, then maybe we should be using a way of marking time governed by His story and not that of Julius Caesar (our calendar is the "Julia" calendar after all). All three of these mean that the church calendar is something that is not commanded in Scripture, and thus not something we are bound to, but could be a helpful tool for our growth in our relationship with Jesus.

Think of it kind of like a "Quiet Time". There is nothing in Scripture that commands us to have a daily time of Scripture reading, prayer, and journaling. In fact, for the vast majority of the history of the Church this would have been impossible. That said, it is a greatly beneficial practice that helps us know the Scriptures more, spend concentrated time in prayer, and have space for meditation on God and His Word. So then, think of the church calendar in a similar way to our contemporary practices. A Quiet Time can be incredibly beneficial for your spiritual growth. It can also be something you simply go through the motions on which doesn't help you at all. The same could be said for Lent.

If you've never practiced Lent, I would encourage you to give it a try this year. Now, before you find a reason to say no, let me clarify how I would suggest you do so. The biggest question regarding Lent is what to fast from. Remember, the point is to fast in such a way that focuses you on your neediness. With that in mind, here's what I generally suggest. Ask yourself this question, when the wheels fall off in my life or I am terribly disrupted, what do I run to? This question is great because it is VERY person specific. It could be food, a particular type of food, exercise, Netflix, alcohol, social media, or even... chocolate. Whatever you answer that question with, that is what you want to fast from. The answer to that question points out a strategy you use to either cope with or distract you from your own feelings of neediness and vulnerability. In other words, it is a way you deal with life independently. What you are looking to do is spend 40 days (or 40 days plus the Sundays... that one is up to you) without utilizing those independent strategies. When the wheels fall off, when you feel disrupted, instead of going to those things, you go to the Lord and confess your need for Him.

This fast is then broken on Easter Sunday as we celebrate and feast over the victory of our Savior! Maybe that means that we revert to how we've used those strategies or maybe the period of fasting and repentance allows those things to return to just being good things in our lives. In any case, the season allows us to prepare for the single greatest celebration in all of Christianity, as John Owen called it, the death of death in the death of Christ. I hope you'll consider giving it a try this year.
 
My pastor sent the following in the weekly newsletter. I ask for your prayers and advice as I consider how do I respond to my pastor and session. For background, this is a PCA church where I'm a member and where, in general, I find little that afflicts my conscience.
Is this preparation for the imposition of such in the Lord's Day worship? I say imposition because if it is implemented there it is no longer a private practice but a public one.

I would also like to know what gives one the right to pick and choose what parts of the tradition one accepts since, acknowledging its extra-biblical character, it must have its own authority to which the adherent submits himself. Indeed such things in the history of the church have their own energy or thrust which one cannot merely adopt midstream without polluting oneself with a notion of piety that acts against the ebb and flow of our own confessional adherence (see especially WCF 16.1 below). This concerns me then beyond the practice itself.

After gaining some perspective on what the session wishes to promote as the church's practice, I would press them on their understanding of Galatians 4:10. The context is not merely Christian liberty or even a difference of opinion but that of redemption and sonship, so even if Paul is not shutting the door on 'holy days' (to which understanding I demur) he neither recommends or commends them either except in its historical participation because the parties had participated in them by divine command (vs. 1ff.) Now being free of such things, what would drive a congregation to establish its own season which has no basis in scripture whatsoever?

Westminster Confession of Faith 16.1 Good works are only such as God hath commanded in his holy Word, and not such as, without the warrant thereof, are devised by men out of blind zeal, or upon any pretense of good intention.
 
Last edited:
The ramifications of Easter and Lent are tragic. We need the resurrection daily. WLC 75 and Rom. 6:4 connect the resurrection directly with our sanctification. Easter confines it to one day a year. But the battle with our sin and our need for daily holiness is too serious to think on it deeply one day out of the year.

We have a commemorative holy day already as well. Our Standards are clear that the resurrection that the change from Saturday to the Lord's Day is on the basis of Christ's resurrection. On which day did the resurrected Christ often appear unto His disciples? Ps. 118, Christ becoming the cornerstone is what makes it to be the day the Lord has made. We've had this since the resurrection.

Lent? It teaches us that we need 40 days of preparation before we can think properly on the resurrection. I'm sorry, but I need the resurrection today. I do not have 40 days to spare in this, and Christ doesn't expect it of us.

If we need a preparatory season, there's Saturday night. As God commanded Israel to do all their work beforehand so they can worship undistracted and sanctify themselves, so we do as well.
 
I think your minister summed it up pretty well: "for many of us, all we think about is arbitrary abstinence." That's what the "church calendar" is in its most innocuous form - the more sinister motive may be the introduction of the evils of syncretism by the deceiver of the whole world. Why didn't the new covenant Church need this "opportunity" during the first 3 centuries? I feel like your minister tried to redeem this Roman practice but failed for many reasons:

"The first was to annually tell the story of redemption." That is the Church's task every Lord's Day;

"The second was as a way to regularly practice spiritual disciplines. Lent, in particular, is an annual time of fasting, something Jesus commends and seems to assume we do (Matt 6:16)." We are called to do this regularly and privately (Matt 6.1-16 - context!) or in special times of individual and/or corporate duty (see "Concerning Publick Solemn Fasting" in the West. Dir. for Pub. Wor.);

"The third reason was what some scholars call the redemption of time. This one is a little more abstract. The thought here is that if Jesus is the Lord and not Caesar, then maybe we should be using a way of marking time governed by His story and not that of Julius Caesar (our calendar is the "Julia" calendar after all)." I don't disagree. But then why does your minister use the term "Sunday" instead of "the Lord's Day" (which is a helpful Biblical reminder of our duties on that day every week)? Isn't the "church calendar" really just largely substituting the Constantinian calendar for the Julian?;

"There is nothing in Scripture that commands us to have a daily time of Scripture reading, prayer, and journaling. In fact, for the vast majority of the history of the Church this would have been impossible." Fair enough on journaling. But 1 Thessalonians 5:17? And Acts 17.11?;

I'm afraid I really don't much specific advice not knowing your minister/session - some take questioning better than others. Maybe ask them for resources showing how the church calendar came into being - hopefully their digging them up will cause questions to arise in their own minds as you pray for reformation. Or maybe ask why the non-continental Reformers were so against maintaining this calendar and these festival days (see the Scots First Book of Discipline, Ex. of First Head, "AN APPENDIX, Touching Days and Places for Publick Worship." at the end of the West. Dir. for Pub. Wor., etc.). - in other words, ask what has changed to necessitate reintroducing them?
 
@Northern Crofter I very much appreciated your thoughtful and specific analysis and I incorporated much of it into my reply. Now my prayer shifts to it being received in the love and concern with which I sent it.
This has been bothering me ever since I read it on Wednesday. I appreciate how you state we are not bound by the church calendar. But I feel that clarification got lost in the rest of the defense and commendation of Ash Wednesday and Lent. And in the end, if we are to break our fast from "independent strategies" after forty days have we not diluted God's call to a lifetime of discipline (1 Cor 9)?

To address the church calendar, specifically:

"The first was to annually tell the story of redemption." Is not this the Church's task every Lord's Day?

"The second was as a way to regularly practice spiritual disciplines. Lent, in particular, is an annual time of fasting, something Jesus commends and seems to assume we do (Matt 6:16)." I agree we are to be privately fasting in response to the Spirit's work in our lives. But where has God ordained that He will call each individual to fasting for the same forty days each year?

"The third reason was what some scholars call the redemption of time. This one is a little more abstract. The thought here is that if Jesus is the Lord and not Caesar, then maybe we should be using a way of marking time governed by His story and not that of Julius Caesar (our calendar is the "Julia" calendar after all)." If we are to mark time as governed by Jesus as Lord, doesn't that direct us right back to the Lord's Day as the only marking of time God commanded?

"There is nothing in Scripture that commands us to have a daily time of Scripture reading, prayer, and journaling. In fact, for the vast majority of the history of the Church this would have been impossible." Fair enough on journaling but how are we to read Acts 17:11 (Scripture reading) and 1 Thes 5:17 (prayer) if not as the foundation that forms our own BCO 63-2 and the original WDFW I?

You started the newsletter with "In general, our tradition is not a fan of the church calendar." The rejection of the church calendar was founded not on preference but hard wrestling with Scripture. While the PCA has not included the divines' rejection (WDPW-Appendix) in our Directory of Public Worship, what has changed to make what was so soundly rejected into a useful tool?

Soli Deo Gloria, Chris
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top