Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My understanding is that he still has a true, though glorified, human nature. He did seem to eat with his disciples post-resurrection, and he still bore scars. This is also one of the reasons why the Reformed deny the Catholic and Lutheran doctrines of transubstantiation and consubstantiation-- to claim that Jesus' physical body is present would seem to imply that his body is not a real human body bound by space and time.Does Jesus today still experience the limitations of humanity? Does he still eat, sleep, learn, and all of the other things he experienced on earth?
I think the need to sleep or eat might be a "common infirmity." Calvin on eating the fish in Luke 24:43 says:Q. 52. How was Christ exalted in his resurrection?
A. Christ was exalted in his resurrection, in that, not having seen corruption in death (of which it was not possible for him to be held), and having the very same body in which he suffered, with the essential properties thereof (but without mortality, and other common infirmities belonging to this life), really united to his soul...
He does not experience pain, which he did during his estate of humiliation. As for learning, while I believe he has been given even greater revelations in glorification than he experienced before, I believe in his human nature he is still not omniscient.During the whole course of his life, he had subjected himself to the necessity of eating and drinking; and now, though relieved from that necessity, he eats for the purpose of convincing his disciples of the certainty of his resurrection.
Could we not get a glimpse of some of this in the Revelation to John when Jesus appeared in his glorified state? Eyes like fire, Hair white as wool, feet like burning bronze, voice like many waters; the self-proclamation of being the Alpha & Omega. Not sure what type of limitations he now has, but John fell down as dead at the sight of him glorified, which he didnt do at his transfiguration with Moses and Elijah, nor do we see either Mary do so at the sight of Angels. Jesus whether taking on human flesh is Very God of Very God; and if I am correct, the only part of the Trinity the Saints will ever behold. I really cannot see him having any limitations, except the ability to sin.Does Jesus today still experience the limitations of humanity? Does he still eat, sleep, learn, and all of the other things he experienced on earth?
Surely he is supremely glorious in a way that he was not on earth before the ascension. And yet, even by being in a place and visible he is limited in his human nature in a way he is not in his divine nature. This is a major point of disagreement with Lutherans, who believe his human nature is omnipresent and so we can receive it locally in the supper.Could we not get a glimpse of some of this in the Revelation to John when Jesus appeared in his glorified state?
In what way would that be though? Did he not suddenly appear to his disciples after his resurrection, so that this would signify that he is not confined to physicality? He is seen to do this even prior to his crucifixion when "walking through the midst of them?" I am interested to know in what way he is limited by his humanity post-glorification?Surely he is supremely glorious in a way that he was not on earth before the ascension. And yet, even by being in a place and visible he is limited in his human nature in a way he is not in his divine nature. This is a major point of disagreement with Lutherans, who believe his human nature is omnipresent and so we can receive it locally in the supper.
This would be a miracle by the power of the Spirit.He is seen to do this even prior to his crucifixion when "walking through the midst of them?"
This glory would be of his divine nature, which preexisted his human nature."Jesus says, “Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed.”
Could we not get a glimpse of some of this in the Revelation to John when Jesus appeared in his glorified state? Eyes like fire, Hair white as wool, feet like burning bronze, voice like many waters; the self-proclamation of being the Alpha & Omega. Not sure what type of limitations he now has, but John fell down as dead at the sight of him glorified, which he didnt do at his transfiguration with Moses and Elijah, nor do we see either Mary do so at the sight of Angels. Jesus whether taking on human flesh is Very God of Very God; and if I am correct, the only part of the Trinity the Saints will ever behold. I really cannot see him having any limitations, except the ability to sin.
To add to this, Wilhelmus à Brakel says: "He ate with his disciples to further assure them of His resurrection, not because He was in need of nourishment. His stomach also did not digest this nourishment, since this would be inconsistent with a glorified body. Rather, by His omnipotence He caused the food to disappear." (The Christian's Reasonable Service 1:630)WLC
I think the need to sleep or eat might be a "common infirmity." Calvin on eating the fish in Luke 24:43 says:
He does not experience pain, which he did during his estate of humiliation. As for learning, while I believe he has been given even greater revelations in glorification than he experienced before, I believe in his human nature he is still not omniscient.
Similarly, Calvin:His stomach also did not digest this nourishment, since this would be inconsistent with a glorified body. Rather, by His omnipotence He caused the food to disappear.
This is the true and pious meditation on this narrative, in which believers may advantageously rest, dismissing questions of mere curiosity, such as, “Was this corruptible food digested?” “What sort of nourishment did the body of Christ derive from it?” and, “What became of what did not go to nourishment?” As if it had not been in the power of Him who created all things out of nothing to reduce to nothing a small portion of food, whenever he thought fit.
I'm not sure about this. Turretin:and the glory of His deity be immediately communicated to and in us
Still that seems to us the more probable opinion which asserts that the essence of God cannot be immediately attained by the saints so as to be seen just as it is, on account of the infinite disproportion and distance between the finite and the infinite. Nor is what is said of the sight of face to face an objection, because it denotes only a clearer mode of the divine knowledge in comparison with the knowledge of faith...
20.VIII.XIV. It is interesting that he doesn't say one way or the other for sure, and even seems to leave open the door for seeing the essence of God (though elsewhere he is sure that whatever it is is "inadequate and apprehensive.")Hello John, would you please give me the section where that is in Turretin? Thanks!
I wasn't sure about "immediate," but reading your explanation I think it's fine. If it means that we no longer see God by faith but by (spiritual) sight, then perhaps the beatific vision could be said to be immediate in that way rather than the mediated (by faith) vision we have now.But whether the soul will immediately see the very essence of God or only some reflection of it, rather the brightness and glory suitable to the other life, because the Scripture does not disclose it to us, so neither should we rashly define anything concerning it.
Thanks, I’ve learned a lot!But then he will communicate himself immediately to the saints