Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The foundation of rock music is the beat from pagan and tribal roots. There is absolutely nothing in rock music that is glorifying to God.
Is it when the music induces foot-tapping?
I think it would be truer to say He is able to transform them. We'd better not assume he has done it. He is able to transform pagans into believers but for his own good purposes he leaves many as pagans.I believe that just as God transforms pagans into believers, He transforms the creation (even originally pagan forms of music).
I also believe redeemed culture builds community with our brothers and sisters in Christ.
Just a heads up, Christ the Center aka Reformed Forum just had a helpful audio conversation on thinking biblically about these and related topics: Reformed Forum - Reformed Theology Podcasts, Videos, Blogs and More - The show is titled "A Theology of Culture."
Aww, the music debate... I still think Romans 14 applies to music. Some people were just "eating" food and others thought they were participating in "idol worship." There is nothing inherently evil in sounds just like there is nothing inherently evil in food. Sounds are signs that can be interpreted differently by different people. This is the situation addressed in Romans 14. The same situation (eating of meat) was seen by everyone, but it was interpreted differently by everyone. Thus, when it comes to "rock music", some people interpret it as "evil Satan music" where as others interpret it simply as "just another type of music." Let's grow in grace my brethren..
Growing in grace is just the point of this thread brother. Have you read through the posts?
Growing in grace is just the point of this thread brother. Have you read through the posts?
More like skim. Did I miss something that should hinder me from saying "Let's grow in grace"?
“There are many real children of God who appear to know far more than they live up to, and see far more than they practice, and yet continue in this state for many years. …
These are they who get the notion into their minds, that it is impossible for all believers to be so very holy and very spiritual! They allow that eminent holiness is a beautiful thing. They like to read about it in books, and even to see it occasionally in others. But they do not think that all are meant to aim at so high a standard. At any rate, they seem to make up their minds it is beyond their reach. …
These are they who are always trying to keep in with the world. They are ingenious in discovering reasons for not separating decidedly, and in framing plausible excuses for attending questionable amusements, and keeping up questionable friendships.”
I've not posted in this thread yet. I did post in the thread that spawned this thread. I am very attuned musically. I grew up surrounded by music, am moved deeply by music, and have VERY wide tastes of appreciation. In the past few years I have had to realise that my tastes and appreciation may not necessarily honour God. The very concerts that I mentioned in the other thread I would now not attend. I used to enjoy them. Now, the thought of them and my interaction with them bothers me. Yes, it takes a great deal of skill to play guitar like Eddie VanHalen. Yes, Southern Rock can put some rhythms and harmonies together in such a way that it can make good bumps crawl up my back. Hearing a skilled tenor sing an aria can send my spirit soaring. There are certain symphonic pieces that can move me powerfully. Music is power. Note that I did not say music has power. It is power. There is almost nothing on earth that can elicit such strong reaction from a man as music.
Playing live bluegrass is one of my greatest joys. There is nothing like standing in a jam circle and just FEELING the chords lock as you play. But, even bluegrass has songs I cannot play. There are certain operas to which I can no longer listen. There are bands in the rock, jazz, CCM, country, and other genres that should be avoided, I think, simply because of what they are trying to do with the musical gifts that they have been given. That is not legalism. It is discernment. All too often we try to find justification for the things we enjoy that may be very close to the line, or over the line, of dishonouring our creator. It is almost as if we are five year olds trying to see just how much we can get away with doing without incurring the wrath of our parents.
Music is a gift from God. I communicates with something within us at a very deep level. Something as powerful as that should be treated with care.
I would like to add that I think so often we are quick to defend our point of view rather than filtering our point of view through Scripture. In other words, we are seeing things through our eyes only rather than asking God to help us see things as He seems them. Jesus, as our example, lived in the world, and yet was not taken in by the foolishness of the world. Yet He managed to enjoy what was going on around Him without partcipating in the sin of it.
I would like to add that I think so often we are quick to defend our point of view rather than filtering our point of view through Scripture. In other words, we are seeing things through our eyes only rather than asking God to help us see things as He seems them. Jesus, as our example, lived in the world, and yet was not taken in by the foolishness of the world. Yet He managed to enjoy what was going on around Him without partcipating in the sin of it.
But that's just it, I don't think we can come up with an example of Christ actively participating in "the world". He was indeed an observer to the culture that was going on about Him, but he was not a part of 1st century AD "pop culture". He was drawing souls out of it, but he was not part and parcel of it as a participant. So much of the simple act of participation in the popular culture is completely counter-Christian, I don't know how someone can ever get their head around "going with the flow" as harmless.
What is pervasive in the culture of today? Materialism. Self-worship. Chasing after vanity in its numerous manifestations.
"Hey, what's Brangelina up to today?"
"Hmm, I don't know. They haven't twitted about anything in over 18 hours."
"I read in Cosmo last week that they were splitting up. But that issue has been out for over a week now. Who knows what they're up to now..."
"Oh, there was an article in that issue about the new 64G ipod that not only surfs the web and records full technicolor video, it also blah blah blah blah."
"I know! The 32 gigabyte model is so five minutes ago. I wouldn't use it in public if my live depended on it."
Yada yada yada. Thus pass the days of worldly existence numbers 5,654,325,437 and 5,654,325,438. No thank you.
Christ came into the World to redeem souls out of it, not to passively marinate in it.
For those who currently listen to "rock music" you may consider this documentary: Hell's Bells 2: The Spirit of Popular Music. It's done by the same gents that did Amazing Grace: The History and Theology of Calvinism. It may seem pricey, but keep in mind it's 370 minutes long. Here are the reviews on Amazon, however, in this case it's cheaper to buy directly from the Apologetics Group.
As for me and my house, we are now purged of this god hating, self glorifying filth.
"Worldliness" is simply another term for sin (see 1 John 2:15-17). Sin is, in turn, defined by Scripture and Scripture alone. I fear that many who label certain things like music genres "worldly" do so on the basis of personal opinion or preference rather than grounding their censure in Scripture alone. For a definition of "worldliness" and some practical ramifications, see What In the World Is Worldliness?: Providing Some Biblical Clarity on a Misused Term.
Your servant,
He was indeed an observer to the culture that was going on about Him, but he was not a part of 1st century AD "pop culture". He was drawing souls out of it, but he was not part and parcel of it as a participant. So much of the simple act of participation in the popular culture is completely counter-Christian, I don't know how someone can ever get their head around "going with the flow" as harmless.
Should we be comfortable (not to mention take pleasure) in a setting
• Where the philosophy, and thus the lyrics, of the artists use God and our Redeemer’s name as a swear word
• where the world-view of the artists and fans is opposed to God and His law
• where fornication, adultery, drug abuse are celebrated
• where the God ordained standards of family, selfless love, and self control are notoriously absent
• where women are degraded as objects for throw away pleasures
Was there was such a thing as "pop culture" back then? I would distinguish both folk culture and high culture from "pop culture", and it's difficult to imagine "pop culture" without capitalism and a certain level of technology; or perhaps it's just that "pop culture" from every epoch is the most ephemeral production, and therefore, until our days, the least likely to be preserved. Anyway, I don't mean to disrail the thread - just wondering if "pop culture" really has an analogue in the distant past (though I suppose paid but essentially shallow performers and producers are pretty much a constant of city life).
"Worldliness" is simply another term for sin (see 1 John 2:15-17). Sin is, in turn, defined by Scripture and Scripture alone. I fear that many who label certain things like music genres "worldly" do so on the basis of personal opinion or preference rather than grounding their censure in Scripture alone. For a definition of "worldliness" and some practical ramifications, see What In the World Is Worldliness?: Providing Some Biblical Clarity on a Misused Term.
Your servant,
Was there was such a thing as "pop culture" back then? I would distinguish both folk culture and high culture from "pop culture", and it's difficult to imagine "pop culture" without capitalism and a certain level of technology; or perhaps it's just that "pop culture" from every epoch is the most ephemeral production, and therefore, until our days, the least likely to be preserved. Anyway, I don't mean to disrail the thread - just wondering if "pop culture" really has an analogue in the distant past (though I suppose paid but essentially shallow performers and producers are pretty much a constant of city life).
I guess by 'pop culture' I am referring as much to the general entertainment/gossip/accepted norms of the day as anything else. For instance, I recall hearing that while Shakespeare was alive, and his plays were being performed at the Globe theatre in London, the most popular entertainment of the day was still bear-baiting. The bear-baiting I would thus count as part of the 'pop culture' of that day, but would likely also throw Shakespeare's plays into the mix. Whatever makes up the secular distraction mosaic of the day for the common man, would, under this definition, be considered part of the 'pop culture'.