Study stirs controversy about abuse

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nebrexan

Puritan Board Freshman
From the labs of a state university:

Christian fundamentalists may not always practice what they preach, two Texas Tech professors found. According to a recent study, the more fundamental the Christian beliefs college students adopt, the more likely they are to commit domestic abuse.

"The study defined Christian fundamentalism as ... the belief that following strict behavior through a Christian fellowship leads to eternal life." That sounds like more of a cult to me.

Original article: Study stirs controversy about abuse | Lubbock Online | Lubbock Avalanche-Journal
 
From the labs of a state university:

Christian fundamentalists may not always practice what they preach, two Texas Tech professors found. According to a recent study, the more fundamental the Christian beliefs college students adopt, the more likely they are to commit domestic abuse.

"The study defined Christian fundamentalism as ... the belief that following strict behavior through a Christian fellowship leads to eternal life." That sounds like more of a cult to me.

Original article: Study stirs controversy about abuse | Lubbock Online | Lubbock Avalanche-Journal

Did they include Mormons in this group? That's one question I would ask.
 
I grew up in a fundamentalist church, and there actually was a lot of physical abuse going on - more of kids than of women, actually. I wouldn't find it hard to believe that there was a correlation between legalistic fundamentalism and violence - but I'm also not sure this study was done in an entirely fair manner. The researchers seem to be confused about what fundamentalism is. (Or maybe I'm confused about what it is?)
 
"The study defined Christian fundamentalism as ... the belief that following strict behavior through a Christian fellowship leads to eternal life." That sounds like more of a cult to me.

This is not Christianity, let alone fundamentalism.
 
The articles seems to come with the assumption that almost all (if not all) forms of corporal punishment is wrong and constitutes child abuse or some other similar things. It also doesn't really define "strict behavior" very well: is it abstinence from sex until marriage, which is Biblical morality? Or is it prohibitions of things the Scriptures are silent upon? (which gives the definition more credit)

As the values of secular culture differ more and more from that of historic, biblical Christianity, expect more finger-pointing towards the followers of Christ. But it is indeed a fact that within some sectors of fundamentalism, abusive behavior that exceeds biblical authority does happen. Spiritual, physical, yes even sexual abuse. Conservative and fundamentalist Christians would do well to condemn such things and seek to ensure such things do not define "fundamentalism" - which is historically supposed to mean adherence to the basics of the Christian faith without compromise. This doesn't just include things like the Trinity and biblical inerrancy, but also Christian charity in conduct.
 
Fred Phelps's son has written a very disturbing article about life in the Phelps home: there was a lot of abuse. I can't imagine that being constantly filled with rage and hate is somehow going to bypass your family, even if you would hate anyone else who hurt them. Of course, that's not Christianity.
But within the ranks of those who call themselves fundamentalists, which doesn't exclude all the Reformed churches, and whom we would be inclined to call brethren in the judgment of charity, there are certain dynamics that promote abusive situations. For one thing, there is often a great deal of value placed on reputation: whether it be as a "testimony" to the ungodly or as an "example" to other believers; that in turn can create tremendous pressure to keep up appearances. That means that the perception of your godliness (which many people can't distinguish from the thing itself) is tied up with the behaviour of your children - so you keep them in line at any cost. Add in to that the vivid conception of their danger of hell from sin, and that disobedience is sin, and very radical measures no longer seem inappropriate.
The keeping up appearances dynamic also plays into situations of church discipline.
I'm sure there's more that goes into it, but you can see from that how even sincere people could easily go too far; the answer, of course, is a practical reliance on the grace of God and submission to His will, with a repudiation of the fear of man.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top