The Hobbit

Status
Not open for further replies.
Uhhh... like they need signatures? Please, please, please let me invest in this. I'll mortgage my house. Making this movie is like a license to print money, and then collect money from toys, and video games, and so on.

If it doesn't happen - I'll be flabbergasted.
 
Still waiting...

bilbo.jpg
 
I want Peter Jackson to have no more hand in the desecration of the writings of J.R.R. Tolkien. Leave me be with my still fairly pristine impression of the Hobbit, and by all means touch not The Silmarillion!!

I think this is more deserving of a letter writing campaign.


:P

[Edited on 9-7-2006 by bradofshaw]
 
The movies were awsome and helped me visuliza what I was reading. But the books are by far the best pieces of fantasy I've ever read truly lightyears beyond the films.
 
Okay, Brad....give it up. What's your beef?

Well, I mostly said that to be contrary. I got into too many debates on this subject in college. I know there are some other people who feel like I do about these movies, but I have always been stunned by how many people consider these to be good movies. I'm in the extreme minority though, so its possible I'm just crazy (and its really not worth arguing about).

These movies have some truly horrible acting and gimicy special effects (the best being Legolas surfing on the backs of the eliphants). Peter Jackson always finds just the right time to screw up a great scene or portion of the book with a rewrite (Faromir, The Counsel of Elrond, any part with Liv Tyler in it...) . This guy had a perfectly good script to go off of, and he had to ruin it by rewriting it. In general, I am opposed to CGI and there was WAY too mutch for me to believe the world in the movie.

All in all, the books were just so good, and the movie had no chance to live up to it in my mind, but I couldn't help but feel cheated because PJ didn't even seem to try to get it right most of the time.

Mostly, I'm upset because the movie's popularity ruined my elitist mindset that I was one of a privileged few who had read and enjoyed LoTR, and now everybody and their baby sister has seen the movie and has (had) Legolas posters on their wall. :bigsmile:
 
I didn't ask to start and argument...I was seriously curious.

I agree, no movie can ever be as good as the book. There are things that can be conveyed in books that can never be conveyed in a play or movie. For those of us that haven't had the time to get through such volumes (the writing is excellent In my humble opinion) ithe movies did provide a GLIMPSE of the them...and it got my 4th grader into wanting to actually READ the Hobbit for himself (he wants to know what happened before). So there are pros and cons. (and hey, that surf thing was at least comical...especially with the drawf's ending comment on it)
 
The funny thing is that I would probably go see a movie of The Hobbit anyway. I think I'm a little less bull headed then I was in college. Maybe I would enjoy it more...
 
Peter Jackson dropped from "Hobbit" film: letter

Nov 20, 2006

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Where is Frodo when you need him? Director Peter Jackson has been told he will not be hired to direct a movie based on J.R.R. Tolkien novel "The Hobbit," despite the nearly $3 billion global box office success of his "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, according to a letter Jackson wrote to fan site TheOneRing.net.

The trilogy of movies is based on Tolkien's fantastic tale of an epic war among wizards, sorcerers, elves, villainous orcs and friendly little hobbits of whom the novel's hero, Frodo, is one. It is Frodo who eventually saves the day. "The Hobbit" is a fairy tale-like story that Tolkien wrote before the "Rings" trilogy.

In Jackson's letter, which was posted on the Web site late on Sunday, the director said last week a top executive with Los Angeles-based New Line Cinema called him to say the studio was moving ahead on "The Hobbit" movie without Jackson.

"This was a courtesy call to let us know that the studio was now actively looking to hire another filmmaker," Jackson wrote.

A spokesman for New Line declined to comment citing company policy, and a Los Angeles representative for New Zealand-based Jackson was not immediately available.

Chris Pirrotta, co-founder of TheOneRing.net, said the fan site has a long-running relationship with Jackson. Since posting the letter, he said the site has received some 100,000 visitors, far above the more normal 15,000 per day.

"They are very upset," Pirrotta told Reuters. "We are seeing calls for everything from letter writing campaigns to a boycott of the studio."

New Line and Jackson's production company, Wingnut Films, are currently embroiled in a lawsuit over income from 2001's "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring," which is the first film in the trilogy.

In his letter, Jackson said he and his producing partners have refused to discuss a "Hobbit" film until the lawsuit is settled, and he added that New Line informed him the studio had limited time to make the film so it must move on.

"Given that New Line are committed to this course of action, we felt at the very least, we owed you, the fans, a straightforward account of events as they have unfolded for us," Jackson wrote.

The other two films in the trilogy are 2002's "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers" and 2003's final installment, "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King," which earned 11 Oscars including best film and best director.

New Line is a unit of New York-based media company Time Warner Inc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top